Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25683292›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience research2015

The marmoset monkey as a model for visual neuroscience.

Jude F Mitchell, David A Leopold

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Census and genetic analysis of the United States marmoset population.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Intracerebral Transplantation of Enteric Glia.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Neural Recording Chambers for Long-Term Access to Brain Tissue.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jude F MitchellBrain and Cognitive Sciences Department, Meliora Hall, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA. Electronic address: jmitchell@bcs.rochester.edu.
David A LeopoldSection on Cognitive Neurophysiology and Imaging, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; Neurophysiology Imaging Facility, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: leopoldd@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Neurophysiology of Visual PerceptionZIAMH002838 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI LEOPOLD, DAVID A · 2009 to 2025
$14.0M
Visual Adaptation and Neuronal SelectivityZIAMH002898 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI LEOPOLD, DAVID A · 2009 to 2025
$13.6M
Optogenetic tools to distinguish neuronal class in behaving non-human primatesR21MH104756 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MILLER, CORY T, MITCHELL, JUDE F · 2014 to 2015
$508k
Intramural NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS R21 MH104756NIMH NIH HHS R21-MH104756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) has been valuable as a primate model in biomedical research. Interest in this species has grown recently, in part due to the successful demonstration of transgenic marmosets. Here we examine the prospects of the marmoset model for visual neuroscience research, adopting a comparative framework to place the marmoset within a broader evolutionary context. The marmoset's small brain bears most of the organizational features of other primates, and its smooth surface offers practical advantages over the macaque for areal mapping, laminar electrode penetration, and two-photon and optical imaging. Behaviorally, marmosets are more limited at performing regimented psychophysical tasks, but do readily accept the head restraint that is necessary for accurate eye tracking and neurophysiology, and can perform simple discriminations. Their natural gaze behavior closely resembles that of other primates, with a tendency to focus on objects of social interest including faces. Their immaturity at birth and routine twinning also makes them ideal for the study of postnatal visual development. These experimental factors, together with the theoretical advantages inherent in comparing anatomy, physiology, and behavior across related species, make the marmoset an excellent model for visual neuroscience.

Indexed as

Models, AnimalVisual PerceptionAnimalsBiological EvolutionBrainCallithrixColor PerceptionColor VisionExploratory BehaviorMacacaSocial BehaviorVision, BinocularVision, OcularBehaviorCognitionComparativeMarmosetPrimateVision

Identifiers

PMID25683292
PMCPMC4408257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.