Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25683226›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2015

Dermatologic adverse events in pediatric patients receiving targeted anticancer therapies: a pooled analysis.

Viswanath Reddy Belum, Courtney Washington, Christine A Pratilas, Vincent Sibaud, Franck Boralevi, Mario E Lacouture

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hair disorders in patients with cancer.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Selective use of vandetanib in the treatment of thyroid cancer.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Viswanath Reddy Belum *Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA.
Courtney Washington *Department of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA.
Christine A PratilasDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA.
Vincent SibaudDepartment of Dermatology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire Cancer Toulouse-oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Franck BoraleviUnité de Dermatologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Pellegrin-enfants, Place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France.
Mario E LacoutureDepartment of Dermatology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY USA.

Funding

Summer research experiences for medical students supervised by faculty mentorsR25CA020449 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Charlotte Eielson Ariyan · 1985 to 2026
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA020449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe dermatologic adverse events (AEs) of various molecularly targeted therapies are well-described in adult cancer patients. Little has been reported on the incidence and clinical presentation of such AEs in pediatric patients with cancer. To address this gap, we analyzed the dermatologic AEs reported across clinical trials of targeted anticancer therapies in pediatric patients. PROCEDURES: We conducted an electronic literature search (PubMed, American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meetings' abstracts, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCI's Pediatric Oncology Branch webpage) to identify clinical trials involving targeted anticancer therapies that reported dermatologic AEs in their safety data. Studies were limited to the pediatric population, monotherapy trials (oncology), and English language publications.

resultsPooled data from 19 clinical studies investigating 11 targeted anticancer agents (alemtuzumab, rituximab, imatinib, dasatinib, erlotinib, vandetanib, sorafenib, cabozantinib, pazopanib, everolimus, and temsirolimus) were analyzed. The most frequently encountered dermatologic AEs were rash (127/660; 19%), xerosis (18/100; 18%), mucositis (68/402; 17%), and pruritus (12/169; 7%). Other AEs included pigmentary abnormalities of the skin/hair (13%), hair disorders (trichomegaly, hypertrichosis, alopecia, and madarosis; 14%), urticaria (7%), palmoplantar erythrodysesthesia (7%), erythema, acne, purpura, skin fissures, other 'unknown skin changes', exanthem, infection, flushing, telangiectasia, and photosensitivity.

conclusionThis study describes the dermatologic manifestations of targeted anticancer therapy-related AEs in the pediatric population. Since these AEs are often associated with significant morbidity, it is imperative that pediatric oncologists be familiar with their recognition and management, to avoid unnecessary dose modifications and/or termination, and to prevent impairments in patients' quality of life.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic AgentsChildClinical Trials as TopicHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsPrognosisSkin DiseasesAntineoplastic Agentsadverse eventsdermatologicmucositispediatricpruritusrashtargeted therapies

Identifiers

PMID25683226
PMCPMC4376610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.