Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25682600›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2015

Activity of everolimus (RAD001) in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase I study.

Andreas Günther, Philipp Baumann, Renate Burger, Christian Kellner, Wolfram Klapper, Ralf Schmidmaier, Martin Gramatzki

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Autophagy-related mechanisms for treatment of multiple myeloma.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas GüntherDivision of Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunotherapy, 2 Department of Medicine, University of Kiel, Germany a.guenther@med2.uni-kiel.de.
Philipp BaumannMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität München (LMU), Germany.
Renate BurgerDivision of Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunotherapy, 2 Department of Medicine, University of Kiel, Germany.
Christian KellnerDivision of Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunotherapy, 2 Department of Medicine, University of Kiel, Germany.
Wolfram KlapperDivision of Hematopathology, Institute of Pathology, University of Kiel, Germany.
Ralf SchmidmaierMedizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität München (LMU), Germany.
Martin GramatzkiDivision of Stem Cell Transplantation and Immunotherapy, 2 Department of Medicine, University of Kiel, Germany.
Kiel University · DELMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian target of rapamycin plays an important role in multiple myeloma. The allosteric mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus has long been approved for immunosuppression and has shown activity in certain cancers. This investigator-initiated phase I trial explored the use of everolimus in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma patients who had received two or more lines of prior treatment. Following a dose-escalation design, it called for a fixed dose of oral everolimus. Blood drug levels were monitored and the biological activity of everolimus was evaluated in bone marrow. Seventeen patients were enrolled (age range, 52 to 76 years). All had been previously treated with stem cell transplantation and proteasome inhibitors and almost all with immunomodulatory drugs. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed and the intended final daily dose of 10 mg was reached. Only one severe adverse event was assessed as possibly related to the study drug, namely atypical pneumonia. Remarkably few infections were observed. Although the trial was mainly designed to evaluate feasibility, anti-myeloma activity, defined as clinical benefit, was documented in ten of 15 evaluable patients at every dose level including eight patients with stable disease, one patient with minor remission and one with partial remission. However, the median time to progression was 90 days (range, 13 to 278 days). The biomarker study documented on-target activity of everolimus in malignant plasma cells as well as the microenvironment. The observed responses are promising and allow further studies to be considered, including those testing combination strategies addressing escape pathways. This trial is registered with EudraCT number 2006-002675-41.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersBiopsyBone MarrowEverolimusFemaleHumansImmunomodulationImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersEverolimusImmunosuppressive AgentsSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID25682600
PMCPMC4380728
OpenAlexW2141536797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.