ArticleJournal of biomechanics2015
Distribution of aerosolized particles in healthy and emphysematous rat lungs: comparison between experimental and numerical studies.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction on the bronchodilator response.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Assessment of Left Lung Remodeling With Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Murine Model Following Exposure to Douglas Fir Smoke.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2024Article
- Article
- An Introduction to Biomedical Computational Fluid Dynamics.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- In Silico Optimization of Fiber-Shaped Aerosols in Inhalation Therapy for Augmented Targeting and Deposition across the Respiratory Tract.Pharmaceutics · 2020Article
- Inhalation Exposure Analysis of Lung-Inhalable Particles in an Approximate Rat Central Airway.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Article
- Use of the FDA nozzle model to illustrate validation techniques in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations.PloS one · 2017Article
- Validating Whole-Airway CFD Predictions of DPI Aerosol Deposition at Multiple Flow Rates.Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery · 2016Article
- Targeted drug delivery to emphysematous lungs: Inhibition of MMPs by doxycycline loaded nanoparticles.Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2016Article
- Validating CFD Predictions of Pharmaceutical Aerosol Deposition with In Vivo Data.Pharmaceutical research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In silico models of airflow and particle deposition in the lungs are increasingly used to determine the therapeutic or toxic effects of inhaled aerosols. While computational methods have advanced significantly, relatively few studies have directly compared model predictions to experimental data. Furthermore, few prior studies have examined the influence of emphysema on particle deposition. In this work we performed airflow and particle simulations to compare numerical predictions to data from our previous aerosol exposure experiments. Employing an image-based 3D rat airway geometry, we first compared steady flow simulations to coupled 3D-0D unsteady simulations in the healthy rat lung. Then, in 3D-0D simulations, the influence of emphysema was investigated by matching disease location to the experimental study. In both the healthy unsteady and steady simulations, good agreement was found between numerical predictions of aerosol delivery and experimental deposition data. However, deposition patterns in the 3D geometry differed between the unsteady and steady cases. On the contrary, satisfactory agreement was not found between the numerical predictions and experimental data for the emphysematous lungs. This indicates that the deposition rate downstream of the 3D geometry is likely proportional to airflow delivery in the healthy lungs, but not in the emphysematous lungs. Including small airway collapse, variations in downstream airway size and tissue properties, and tracking particles throughout expiration may result in a more favorable agreement in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.