Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25682345›Full record

ArticleJournal of critical care2015

Care and caring in the intensive care unit: Family members' distress and perceptions about staff skills, communication, and emotional support.

Eve B Carlson, David A Spain, Luma Muhtadie, Liz McDade-Montez, Kathryn S Macia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of critical care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Family experiences and perceptions of intensive care unit care and communication during the COVID-19 pandemic.Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Validation and Analysis of the European Quality Questionnaire in Italian Language.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eve B CarlsonNational Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs, 795 Willow Road (334/NC-PTSD), Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA. Electronic address: eve.carlson@va.gov.
David A SpainDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr., A160 MC 5313, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Luma MuhtadieNational Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs, 795 Willow Road (334/NC-PTSD), Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Liz McDade-MontezNational Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Department of Veterans Affairs, 795 Willow Road (334/NC-PTSD), Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.
Kathryn S MaciaPalo Alto University, 1791 Arastradero Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
VA Palo Alto Health Care System · USNational Center for PTSD · USPalo Alto University · USStanford University · US

Funding

Ecological Proximal Assessment of Trauma SurvivorsR21MH069876 · NIMH · PALO ALTO VETERANS INSTIT FOR RESEARCH · PI CARLSON, EVE B · 2005 to 2006
$335k
NIMH NIH HHS MH 69876NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH069876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFamily members of intensive care unit (ICU) patients are sometimes highly distressed and report lower satisfaction with communication and emotional support from staff. Within a study of emotional responses to traumatic stress, associations between family distress and satisfaction with aspects of ICU care were investigated. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 29 family members of trauma patients who stayed in an ICU, we assessed symptoms of depression and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) during ICU care. Later, family members rated staff communication, support, and skills and their overall satisfaction with ICU care.

resultsRatings of staff competence and skills were significantly higher than ratings of frequency of communication, information needs being met, and support. Frequency of communication and information needs being met were strongly related to ratings of support (rs = .75-.77) and staff skills (rs = .77-.85), and aspects of satisfaction and communication showed negative relationships with symptoms of depression (rs = -.31 to -.55) and PTSD (rs = -.17 to -.43).

conclusionsAlthough satisfaction was fairly high, family member distress was negatively associated with several satisfaction variables. Increased understanding of the effects of traumatic stress on family members may help staff improve communication and increase satisfaction of highly distressed family members.

Indexed as

CommunicationEmpathyIntensive Care UnitsProfessional-Family RelationsAdultCounselingCritical CareDepressionFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionPersonal SatisfactionStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticDepressionFamily/psychologyIntensive care/psychologyIntensive care units/standardsPTSDSatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID25682345
PMCPMC4414707
OpenAlexW1996546269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.