Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25682166›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2016

Appropriate sagittal femoral component alignment cannot be ensured by intramedullary alignment rods.

Günther Maderbacher, Jens Schaumburger, Clemens Baier, Florian Zeman, Hans-Robert Springorum, Anne-Maria Birkenbach, Joachim Grifka, Armin Keshmiri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Patellar tracking in knee arthroplasty].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rotation of intramedullary alignment rods affects distal femoral cutting plane in total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. What is the optimal valgus pre-set for intramedullary femoral alignment rods in total knee arthroplasty?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Günther MaderbacherDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. Guenther.Maderbacher@klinik.uni-regensburg.de.
Jens SchaumburgerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Clemens BaierDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Florian ZemanCenter of Clinical Studies, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Hans-Robert SpringorumDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Anne-Maria BirkenbachDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Joachim GrifkaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Armin KeshmiriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe intraoperative sagittal cutting block alignment when intramedullary alignment rods are used was investigated. Its absolute orthogonal orientation in relation to the mechanical femoral axis should be analysed. It was hypothesized that (1) alignment rods do not ensure a desired deviation within a range between 0° and 3° flexion as it has been shown to be favourable for clinical and functional outcome. Further, the degree of flexion cannot be (2) foreseen by the surgeon or (3) estimated by clinical or radiological parameters.

methodsForty knees allocated to total knee arthroplasty were included. The distal femoral cutting block was aligned using an intramedullary rod. By means of a navigation device, the sagittal alignment of the cutting block in degrees of flexion was measured.

resultsThe mean measured flexion of the cutting block was 4.4° (3.6 SD). Twenty-five per cent (10/40) of the values were within a corridor between 0° and 3° of flexion. The mean difference between expected and measured flexion was -1.5° (-7.6 to 4.7 95 % limits of agreement). The dorsoventral diameter of the distal femur showed a significant influence on measured flexion (R (2) = 0.112, p = 0.035).

conclusionIntramedullary alignment rods used in the present study do not ensure a distal cutting block alignment between 0° and 3° of flexion in relation to the femoral mechanical axis. The extent of flexion could not be foreseen either by the surgeon. The dorsoventral diameter of the distal femur correlated with measured flexion. However, only limited data is available on influence of femoral component flexion on implant failure or clinical and functional outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level II.

Indexed as

Bone MalalignmentInternal FixatorsAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleFemurHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyRange of Motion, ArticularAlignmentFemoral component flexionIntramedullary alignment rodsTKATotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.