Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25682093›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2015

Impact on prognosis of the regional distribution of MGMT methylation with respect to the CpG island methylator phenotype and age in glioma patients.

Pilar Mur, Ángel Rodríguez de Lope, Francisco Javier Díaz-Crespo, Teresa Hernández-Iglesias, Teresa Ribalta, Concepción Fiaño, Juan Fernando García, Juan Antonio Rey, Manuela Mollejo, Bárbara Meléndez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. OWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. OFrontiers in oncology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Pilar MurMolecular Pathology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Virgen de la Salud Hospital, Avda Barber 30, 45004, Toledo, Spain.
Ángel Rodríguez de Lope
Francisco Javier Díaz-Crespo
Teresa Hernández-Iglesias
Teresa Ribalta
Concepción Fiaño
Juan Fernando García
Juan Antonio Rey
Manuela Mollejo
Bárbara Meléndez

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical and molecular prognostic factors in gliomas include age, IDH mutation, the glioma CpG island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP+) and promoter methylation of the O(6)-methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) gene. Among these markers, a predictive value was reported in glioblastomas (GBM) for MGMT promoter methylation, in particular in elderly GBM patients. In this study, methylation data from 46 glioma samples with the Illumina 450K platform were obtained and extended using external data to include a total of 247 glioma samples. Methylation analysis of the whole MGMT gene with this platform revealed two strongly survival-associated CpG regions within the promoter and the gene body, which were confirmed in a reported dataset of high grade-gliomas. Methylation at the promoter (CpG 25, cg12981137 and the prognostic model MGMT-STP27) and at the gene body CpG 165 (cg07933035), were significantly associated with better overall survival, and strongly correlated with G-CIMP+ status. In this series, the prognostic value of MGMT methylation at the promoter was not observed in G-CIMP- cases, although around 50 % of them were MGMT-methylated. These results were also obtained in an homogeneously-treated series of chemoradiated G-CIMP- GBMs analyzed by MSP and qMSP, and confirmed in a reported pyrosequencing-analyzed series of gliomas. Interestingly, in contrast to the MGMT promoter, gene body methylation was of prognostic value in G-CIMP-patients older than 65 years. Our study highlights the relevance of the prognostic value of the different regions of methylation throughout the MGMT gene that could be affected by specific G-CIMP profiles and age groups.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsBrain NeoplasmsCpG IslandsDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhenotypeDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesMGMT protein, humanTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.