ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2015
Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) Algorithms for Toddlers and Young Preschoolers: Application in a Non-US Sample of 1,104 Children.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Examining the perceptions of needs, services and abilities of Czech and North Macedonian caregivers of children with autism and trainers.International journal of developmental disabilities · 2024Article
- Barriers to an Autistic Identity: How RRBs may Contribute to the Underdiagnosis of Females.Research in autism spectrum disorders · 2023Article
- ECG Recordings as Predictors of Very Early Autism Likelihood: A Machine Learning Approach.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Using phecode analysis to characterize co-occurring medical conditions in autism spectrum disorder.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2021Article
- Validating the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised in the Korean Population.Psychiatry investigation · 2021Article
- Validation of Rapid Interactive Screening Test for Autism in Toddlers Using Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule™ Second Edition in Children at High-Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Cross-Cultural Validation of the Polish Version of the ADI-R, Including New Algorithms for Toddlers and Young Preschoolers.Child psychiatry and human development · 2019Article
- ASD Screening with the Child Behavior Checklist/1.5-5 in the Study to Explore Early Development.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2019Article
- Evaluating Sex and Age Differences in ADI-R and ADOS Scores in a Large European Multi-site Sample of Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2018Article
- The influence of parental concern on the utility of autism diagnostic instruments.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2017Article
- Identification of the Genetic Cause for Childhood Disintegrative Disorder by Whole-Exome Sequencing.Neuroscience bulletin · 2017Article
- Adaptation and Validation of the ADOS-2, Polish Version.Frontiers in psychology · 2017Article
- Clinical Validity of the ADI-R in a US-Based Latino Population.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current study aimed to investigate the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) algorithms for toddlers and young preschoolers (Kim and Lord, J Autism Dev Disord 42(1):82-93, 2012) in a non-US sample from ten sites in nine countries (n = 1,104). The construct validity indicated a good fit of the algorithms. The diagnostic validity was lower, with satisfactorily high specificities but moderate sensitivities. Young children with clinical ASD and lower language ability were largely in the mild-to-moderate or moderate-to-severe concern ranges of the ADI-R, nearly half of the older and phrase speech ASD-group fell into the little-to-no concern range. Although broadly the findings support the toddler algorithms, further work is required to understand why they might have different properties in different samples to further inform research and clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.