Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25681780›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacological and toxicological methods

An optimized lactate dehydrogenase release assay for screening of drug candidates in neuroscience.

Simon Kaja, Andrew J Payne, Tulsi Singh, Jasleen K Ghuman, Erin G Sieck, Peter Koulen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A cathepsin C-like protease post-translationally modifiesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Simon KajaVision Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Missouri - Kansas City, School of Medicine, 2411 Holmes St., Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. Electronic address: kajas@umkc.edu.
Andrew J PayneVision Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Missouri - Kansas City, School of Medicine, 2411 Holmes St., Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
Tulsi SinghVision Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Missouri - Kansas City, School of Medicine, 2411 Holmes St., Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
Jasleen K GhumanVision Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Missouri - Kansas City, School of Medicine, 2411 Holmes St., Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
Erin G SieckVision Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Missouri - Kansas City, School of Medicine, 2411 Holmes St., Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.
Peter KoulenVision Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Missouri - Kansas City, School of Medicine, 2411 Holmes St., Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.

Funding

Protein Targets of Oxidative Brain AgingP01AG022550 · NIA · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI SIMPKINS, JAMES W. · 2003 to 2013
$15.7M
System Gene Delivery for Alzheimer's Disease- SupplementP01AG010485 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI ZOLOTUKHIN, SERGEI · 1991 to 2009
$11.3M
ROLE OF MITHOCHONDRIAL ERB IN NEURONAL VULNDERABILITY TO NEUROTOXIC STRESSP01AG027956 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI SINGH, MEHARVAN · 2007 to 2017
$11.3M
Mechanisms of calcium signaling in retinal neuronsR01EY014227 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI KOULEN, PETER · 2003 to 2006
$1.6M
Novel mechanism of action as therapeutic strategy for optic neuritisR01EY022774 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI KOULEN, PETER · 2012 to 2014
$1.2M
Confocal Laser Scanning MicroscopeS10RR027093 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY · PI KOULEN, PETER · 2010 to 2010
$497k
CONFOCAL MICROSCOPE FOR CAMPUS EXPANSION IN THE CBH BUILDING: NEUROSCIENCES10RR022570 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI KOULEN, PETER · 2006 to 2006
$356k
NCRR NIH HHS RR022570NCRR NIH HHS RR027093NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR022570NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027093NEI NIH HHS EY014227NEI NIH HHS EY022774NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014227NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022774NIA NIH HHS AG010485NIA NIH HHS AG022550NIA NIH HHS AG027956NIA NIH HHS P01 AG010485NIA NIH HHS P01 AG022550NIA NIH HHS P01 AG027956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionQuantification of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release is a widely accepted assay for the quantitative determination of cell viability and late-stage apoptosis. Major disadvantages of commercially available LDH assay kits include proprietary formulations, limited options for optimization and high cost, all resulting in limited reproducibility in research applications. Here, we describe a novel, custom LDH assay suitable in the context of plate reader-based screening of drug candidates for glioprotection, but with wide applicability to other cell types and experimental paradigms.

methodsWe developed a novel and highly reproducible LDH release assay that is more cost-effective than commercially available assays with comparable performance. The assay was validated by assessing 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid antioxidant protection against tert-butylhydroperoxide-induced oxidative stress in C6 astroglioma cells. Assay performance was validated by direct comparison and compatible with other methods of measuring cellular viability, namely 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and 6-carboxy-2', 7' dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate assays.

resultsThere was no statistically significant difference between results obtained with the novel custom assay and a commercially available assay CytoTox96® (Promega, Madison, WI). DISCUSSION: The novel custom LDH release assay allows the reproducible quantification of cell viability and is highly cost-effective when compared to commercially available assays (approximately 25 times cheaper). In addition and in contrast to commercially available assays, the identification and detailed description of all assay components and procedures provide greater control over experimental conditions and design. We provide a detailed standard operating procedure permitting our novel assay to be readily adapted depending on experimental requirements.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansL-Lactate DehydrogenaseNeurosciencesReactive Oxygen Speciestert-ButylhydroperoxideAntioxidantsL-Lactate DehydrogenaseReactive Oxygen Speciestert-ButylhydroperoxideC6 glioma cellCell viabilityGliaGlioprotectionHigh-throughput screeningLactate dehydrogenasePlate reader

Identifiers

PMID25681780
PMCPMC4458191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.