Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25681696›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular biology2015

Multiple pathways for protein transport to peroxisomes.

P K Kim, E H Hettema

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. FormatotrophicSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Design rules for efficient endosomal escape.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Ether lipids and a peroxisomal riddle in sperm.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

P K KimProgram in Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1X8; Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 1A8.
E H HettemaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Firth Court, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire S10 2TN, United Kingdom. Electronic address: e.hettema@sheffield.ac.uk.
Hospital for Sick Children · CAUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-111164Wellcome Trust WT084265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peroxisomes are unique among the organelles of the endomembrane system. Unlike other organelles that derive most if not all of their proteins from the ER (endoplasmic reticulum), peroxisomes contain dedicated machineries for import of matrix proteins and insertion of membrane proteins. However, peroxisomes are also able to import a subset of their membrane proteins from the ER. One aspect of peroxisome biology that has remained ill defined is the role the various import pathways play in peroxisome maintenance. In this review, we discuss the available data on matrix and membrane protein import into peroxisomes.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndoplasmic ReticulumHumansMembrane ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesPeroxinsPeroxisomesProtein FoldingProtein TransportReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSignal TransductionMembrane ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesPeroxinsPEX3 protein, S cerevisiaeReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteinsperoxinperoxisomeprotein import

Identifiers

PMID25681696
PMCPMC4726662
OpenAlexW2021128261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.