Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25681559›Full record

ArticleJournal of affective disorders2015

The UCLA Hoarding Severity Scale: development and validation.

Sanjaya Saxena, Catherine R Ayers, Mary E Dozier, Karron M Maidment

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Intolerance of uncertainty in hoarding disorder.Journal of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Executive Functioning in Participants Over Age of 50 with Hoarding Disorder.The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Executive functioning in older adults with hoarding disorder.International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanjaya SaxenaDepartment of Psychiatry, UC San Diego School of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: ssaxena@ucsd.edu.
Catherine R AyersDepartment of Psychiatry, UC San Diego School of Medicine, United States; Research Service, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, United States.
Mary E DozierResearch Service, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, United States.
Karron M MaidmentDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, United States.
Neurobehavioral Systems · USVA San Diego Healthcare System · US

Funding

Neurobiology of Obsessive-Compulsive HoardingR01MH069433 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SAXENA, SANJAYA · 2004 to 2007
$1.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH069433NIMH NIH HHS R01MH069433
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective management of Hoarding Disorder (HD) must begin with assessment of the severity of hoarding symptoms and functional impairment. We sought to validate the UCLA Hoarding Severity Scale (UHSS), a semi-structured, clinician-administered rating scale that measures the severity of both the core symptoms of HD and the associated features of indecisiveness, perfectionism, task prolongation, and procrastination, which are significantly associated with the diagnosis and impairment of HD.

methodsHoarding symptom severity was measured in 62 patients who met DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for HD and 65 normal controls, using the UHSS and the Saving Inventory-Revised (SI-R), a well validated self-report measure of hoarding symptoms.

resultsThe UHSS showed significant internal consistency (Cronbach׳s α=.70). Principal components analysis revealed three factors that accounted for 58% of the variance: 1) associated features and functional impairment, 2) clutter volume and social impairment, and 3) difficulty discarding, urges to save, and excessive acquisition. UHSS and SI-R scores were significantly correlated. UHSS and SI-R total and factor scores of HD patients were all significantly different from those of controls. LIMITATIONS: Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were not assessed. The initial version of the UHSS did not contain rater instructions, so it lacked quantifiable anchor points for ratings.

conclusionsThe UHSS showed internal consistency, construct validity, convergent validity, and known groups discriminant validity. The UHSS validly measures the core symptoms, associated features, and functional impairment of patients with HD. Utilizing a valid clinician-administered scale will provide a more comprehensive and accurate clinical assessment of patients with HD.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesFemaleHoarding DisorderHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSymptom AssessmentAssessmentClinician-administeredFactor analysisHoarding DisorderValidity

Identifiers

PMID25681559
PMCPMC4352402
OpenAlexW2157626445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.