SynthesisNeurology2015
Differences in Alzheimer disease clinical trial outcomes based on age of the participants.
Synthesis in Neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Updated Appropriate Use Criteria for Amyloid and Tau PET: A Report from the Alzheimer's Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Workgroup.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Updated appropriate use criteria for amyloid and tau PET: A report from the Alzheimer's Association and Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Workgroup.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Pooled it
- Testing whether the progression of Alzheimer's disease changes with the year of publication, additional design, and geographical area: a modeling analysis of literature aggregate data.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2020Pooled it
- Evidence for benefit of statins to modify cognitive decline and risk in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2017Pooled it
- Effect of Age on Clinical Trial Outcome in Participants with Probable Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2021Trial
- Application of Item Response Theory to Model Disease Progression and Agomelatine Effect in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.The AAPS journal · 2019Trial
- Data-driven identification of endophenotypes of Alzheimer's disease progression: implications for clinical trials and therapeutic interventions.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2018Trial
- A Phase II Study of Fornix Deep Brain Stimulation in Mild Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2016Trial
- Biomarker-integrated prognostic stagings for Alzheimer's Disease.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Comparison of two preprocessing methods forEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Comparison of plasma and neuroimaging biomarkers to predict cognitive decline in non-demented memory clinic patients.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2024Article
- The impact of tau deposition and hypometabolism on cognitive impairment and longitudinal cognitive decline.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of imaging-based ATN profiles in a memory clinic cohort.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Review
- Heterogeneity in Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis and Progression Rates: Implications for Therapeutic Trials.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022Review
- A geroscience motivated approach to treat Alzheimer's disease: Senolytics move to clinical trials.Mechanisms of ageing and development · 2021Review
- The ideological divide in confidence in science and participation in medical research.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Recruitment and retention of participant and study partner dyads in two multinational Alzheimer's disease registration trials.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2021Article
- Progression of Alzheimer's Disease by Self-Reported Cancer History in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2020Observational
- Evidence for Decreased Nucleolar PARP-1 as an Early Marker of Cognitive Impairment.Neural plasticity · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe tested the a priori hypothesis that older participants differ in rates of decline on cognitive outcomes compared with younger participants, and examined the potential effect of age distributions on individual clinical trial outcomes.
methodsFrom a meta-database of 18 studies from the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, we included a cohort of 2,793 participants for whom there were baseline demographic data and at least one postbaseline cognitive assessment on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog), Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), or Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). We used mixed-effects models (random coefficient models) to estimate change on the outcomes across 7 age groups ranging from younger than 61 years to older than 85 years after adjusting for education.
resultsSignificant worsening occurred in all age groups on all outcomes over time. The 4 older groups, aged 71 years and older, showed slower rates of decline on the ADAS-cog than the younger groups (p = 0.001). The older groups scored 2-3, 2-5, and 4-6 points better than the younger groups at 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. There were similar differences across age groups for the MMSE, but not for the CDR-SB.
conclusionsThe differences in change on the ADAS-cog between older and younger participants are substantially greater than differences expected between experimental drugs and placebo in current trials or differences between marketed cholinesterase inhibitors and placebo. The clinical interpretation of change on the ADAS-cog or MMSE differs depending on age. Until predictors of decline are better understood, considering effects of age on rates of change is particularly important regarding clinical practice and outcomes of trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.