Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25681312›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2015

Hip fracture evaluation with alternatives of total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty (HEALTH): protocol for a multicentre randomised trial.

Mohit Bhandari, P J Devereaux, Thomas A Einhorn, Lehana Thabane, Emil H Schemitsch, Kenneth J Koval, Frede Frihagen, Rudolf W Poolman, Kevin Tetsworth, Ernesto Guerra-Farfán and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00556842 (Hip Fracture Evaluation With Alternatives of Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Hemi-Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00556842 nacompletednot on this map

Hip Fracture Evaluation With Alternatives of Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Hemi-Arthroplasty: A Multi-Centre Randomized Trial Comparing Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hemi-Arthroplasty on Secondary Procedures and Quality of Life in Patients With Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2009 to 2019Enrolled1,495ConditionsHip Fractures, Femoral Neck FracturesArmsTotal hip arthroplasty, Hemi-arthroplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Arthroplasties for hip fracture in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Expertise-based design in surgical trials: a narrative review.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Precise proximal femur fracture classification for interactive training and surgical planning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Mohit BhandariDepartment of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
P J DevereauxDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Thomas A EinhornBoston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lehana ThabaneDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Emil H SchemitschSt Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kenneth J KovalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orlando Regional Medical Centre, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Frede FrihagenOrthopaedic Centre, Ulleval University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Rudolf W PoolmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis/University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Kevin TetsworthUniversity of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Ernesto Guerra-FarfánDepartment of Traumatology Orthopaedic Surgery and Emergency, University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Kim MaddenHamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Sheila SpragueMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Gordon GuyattDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
HEALTH Investigators
McMaster University · CABoston University · USOLVG · NLOrlando Regional Medical Center · USOslo University Hospital · NOSt. Michael's Hospital · CAThe University of Queensland · AUVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

Hip Fracture Evaluation Alternatives of Total Hip vs Hemi-arthroplasty (HEALTH)UM1AR063386 · NIAMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI EINHORN, THOMAS A. · 2012 to 2016
$1.1M
Hip Fracture Evaluation Alternatives of Total Hip vs Hemi-arthroplasty (HEALTH)R01AR055130 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI EINHORN, THOMAS A. · 2008 to 2009
$574k
Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-123609Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-126188NIAMS NIH HHS 1R01AR055130-01A1NIAMS NIH HHS 1UM1AR063386-01NIAMS NIH HHS 5R01AR055130-02NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055130NIAMS NIH HHS UM1 AR063386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHip fractures are a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide, and the number of hip fractures is expected to rise to over 6 million per year by 2050. The optimal approach for the surgical management of displaced femoral neck fractures remains unknown. Current evidence suggests the use of arthroplasty; however, there is lack of evidence regarding whether patients with displaced femoral neck fractures experience better outcomes with total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA). The HEALTH trial compares outcomes following THA versus HA in patients 50 years of age or older with displaced femoral neck fractures. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: HEALTH is a multicentre, randomised controlled trial where 1434 patients, 50 years of age or older, with displaced femoral neck fractures from international sites are randomised to receive either THA or HA. Exclusion criteria include associated major injuries of the lower extremity, hip infection(s) and a history of frank dementia. The primary outcome is unplanned secondary procedures and the secondary outcomes include functional outcomes, patient quality of life, mortality and hip-related complications-both within 2 years of the initial surgery. We are using minimisation to ensure balance between intervention groups for the following factors: age, prefracture living, prefracture functional status, American Society for Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class and centre number. Data analysts and the HEALTH Steering Committee are blinded to the surgical allocation throughout the trial. Outcome analysis will be performed using a χ(2) test (or Fisher's exact test) and Cox proportional hazards modelling estimate. All results will be presented with 95% CIs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The HEALTH trial has received local and McMaster University Research Ethics Board (REB) approval (REB#: 06-151).

resultsOutcomes from the primary manuscript will be disseminated through publications in academic journals and presentations at relevant orthopaedic conferences. We will communicate trial results to all participating sites. Participating sites will communicate results with patients who have indicated an interest in knowing the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The HEALTH trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00556842).

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipClinical ProtocolsFemaleFemoral Neck FracturesHemiarthroplastyHipHip FracturesHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERYSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID25681312
PMCPMC4330331
OpenAlexW1638177528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.