Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25681311›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Psychotherapy for depression in children and adolescents: study protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Bin Qin, Xinyu Zhou, Kurt D Michael, Yiyun Liu, Craig Whittington, David Cohen, Yuqing Zhang, Peng Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bin QinDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xinyu ZhouDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Kurt D MichaelDepartment of Psychology, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, USA.
Yiyun LiuDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Craig WhittingtonCentre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
David CohenSorbonne Universités; and the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotiques, UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMR 7222, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Paris, France.
Yuqing ZhangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Peng XieDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDepression is common among children and adolescents and is associated with significantly negative effects. A number of structured psychosocial treatments are administered for depression in children and adolescents; however, evidence of their effectiveness is not clear. We describe the protocol of a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy, quality of life, tolerability and acceptability of the use of psychological intervention for this young population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL (the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LiLACS, Dissertation Abstracts, European Association for Grey Literature Exploitation (EAGLE) and the National Technical Information Service (NTIS) from inception to July 2014. There will be no restrictions on language, publication year or publication type. Only randomised clinical trials (RCTs) with psychosocial treatments for depression in children and adolescents will be considered. The primary outcome of efficacy will be the mean overall change of the total score in continuous depression severity scales from baseline to end point. Data will be independently extracted by two reviewers. Traditional pairwise meta-analyses will be performed for studies that directly compared different treatment arms. Then we will perform a Bayesian network meta-analyses to compare the relative efficacy, quality of life, tolerability and acceptability of different psychological intervention. Subgroup analyses will be performed by the age of participants and the duration of psychotherapy, and sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical issues are foreseen. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated electronically and in print. The meta-analysis may be updated to inform and guide management of depression in children and adolescents. TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42014010014.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildClinical ProtocolsDepressionDepressive DisorderHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPsychotherapyQuality of LifeResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25681311
PMCPMC4330321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.