Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25681017›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2015

Reprint of "Non-causal spike filtering improves decoding of movement intention for intracortical BCIs".

Nicolas Y Masse, Beata Jarosiewicz, John D Simeral, Daniel Bacher, Sergey D Stavisky, Sydney S Cash, Erin M Oakley, Etsub Berhanu, Emad Eskandar, Gerhard Friehs and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review: Human Intracortical Recording and Neural Decoding for Brain-Computer Interfaces.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nicolas Y MasseDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: masse@uchicago.edu.
Beata JarosiewiczDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA.
John D SimeralCenter for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA; School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Daniel BacherSchool of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Sergey D StaviskySchool of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Sydney S CashNeurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Erin M OakleyNeurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Etsub BerhanuNeurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Emad EskandarNeurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Gerhard FriehsNeurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Leigh R HochbergCenter for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA; School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
John P DonoghueCenter for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Brown Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

Restoring Communication with an Intracortical Neural Interface SystemR01DC009899 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOCHBERG, LEIGH R · 2009 to 2017
$7.0M
Influencing Children's Beliefs Through LanguageR03HD053403 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI KEEN, RACHEL ELIZABETH · 2007 to 2008
$150k
NICHD NIH HHS N01 HD053403NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple types of neural signals are available for controlling assistive devices through brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). Intracortically recorded spiking neural signals are attractive for BCIs because they can in principle provide greater fidelity of encoded information compared to electrocorticographic (ECoG) signals and electroencephalograms (EEGs). Recent reports show that the information content of these spiking neural signals can be reliably extracted simply by causally band-pass filtering the recorded extracellular voltage signals and then applying a spike detection threshold, without relying on "sorting" action potentials. NEW

methodWe show that replacing the causal filter with an equivalent non-causal filter increases the information content extracted from the extracellular spiking signal and improves decoding of intended movement direction. This method can be used for real-time BCI applications by using a 4ms lag between recording and filtering neural signals.

resultsAcross 18 sessions from two people with tetraplegia enrolled in the BrainGate2 pilot clinical trial, we found that threshold crossing events extracted using this non-causal filtering method were significantly more informative of each participant's intended cursor kinematics compared to threshold crossing events derived from causally filtered signals. This new method decreased the mean angular error between the intended and decoded cursor direction by 9.7° for participant S3, who was implanted 5.4 years prior to this study, and by 3.5° for participant T2, who was implanted 3 months prior to this study.

conclusionsNon-causally filtering neural signals prior to extracting threshold crossing events may be a simple yet effective way to condition intracortically recorded neural activity for direct control of external devices through BCIs.

Indexed as

Brain–computer interfaceMicroelectrode arrayNeural decodingNon-causal filterSpike sortingThreshold crossing

Identifiers

PMID25681017
PMCPMC4430555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.