Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25680833›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2015

Cytokinesis in animal cells.

Pier Paolo D'Avino, Maria Grazia Giansanti, Mark Petronczki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
117citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

117 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Non-transport functions of motor proteins in corticogenesis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nuclear envelope budding: Getting large macromolecular complexes out of the nucleus.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pier Paolo D'AvinoDepartment of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1QP, United Kingdom.
Maria Grazia GiansantiIstituto di Biologia e Patologia Molecolari c/o Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie, Università Sapienza di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy.
Mark PetronczkiCell Division and Aneuploidy Laboratory, Cancer Research UK-London Research Institute, Clare Hall Laboratories, South Mimms, Hertfordshire EN6 3LD, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell division ends with the physical separation of the two daughter cells, a process known as cytokinesis. This final event ensures that nuclear and cytoplasmic contents are accurately partitioned between the two nascent cells. Cytokinesis is one of the most dramatic changes in cell shape and requires an extensive reorganization of the cell's cytoskeleton. Here, we describe the cytoskeletal structures, factors, and signaling pathways that orchestrate this robust and yet highly dynamic process in animal cells. Finally, we discuss possible future directions in this growing area of cell division research and its implications in human diseases, including cancer.

Indexed as

CytokinesisActomyosinAnimalsCell MembraneHumansMicrotubulesActomyosin

Identifiers

PMID25680833
PMCPMC4382743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.