Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25680739›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2016

Gambling Disorder Due to Brazilian Animal Game ("Jogo do bicho"): Gambling Behavior and Psychopathology.

Gustavo Medeiros, Jon Grant, Hermano Tavares

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gustavo MedeirosDepartment of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, Rua Padre João Manuel, 173. Ap 71, São Paulo, SP, 01411-001, Brazil. gcmedeiros@live.com.
Jon GrantDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Hermano TavaresDepartment of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, Rua Padre João Manuel, 173. Ap 71, São Paulo, SP, 01411-001, Brazil.

Funding

N-Acetyl Cysteine plus Behavioral Therapy for Nicotine Dependent Pathological GamRC1DA028279 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI GRANT, JON E · 2009 to 2010
$950k
NIDA NIH HHS RC1 DA028279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gambling is currently widespread across the globe and despite legally restricted, it is significantly common in Brazil. A traditional and common form of gambling in Brazil is the Brazilian animal game (BAG)--"Jogo do bicho" in Portuguese. In 2013, BAG activities collected approximately 19 billion Brazilian reais--equivalent to more than 8 billon American dollars, a figure almost 60 % higher than legal lotteries. Although a common form of gambling, the gambling behavior and psychopathology of gambling disorder (GD) associated with BAG has never been systematically studied. The aim of this study is to conduct, the first research approaching GD due to BAG. We assessed 897 participants of whom 63 subjects (7.0 %) presented with GD due to BAG and 834 with GD associated with other forms of gambling. After comparing these two groups, major differences were found in demographics, gambling behavior elements and psychopathological variables. This research reinforces the need for further research on BAG and the need for specific approaches in GD. The particularities of BAG may affect treatment strategies as, for example, suggest some adaptations in social and psychotherapeutic approaches. We also highlight the need to acknowledge the "hidden" BAG as a potential addictive game.

Indexed as

AdultBehavior, AddictiveBrazilFemaleGamblingHumansMaleRecreationSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesVideo GamesBrazilian animal gameGambling disorderIllegal lotteryJogo do bichoLottery

Identifiers

PMID25680739
PMCPMC4537400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.