ArticleEuropean radiology2015
CT findings of minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) of the lung and comparison of solid portion measurement methods at CT in 52 patients.
Article in European radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics combined with computed tomography features for predicting the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma presenting as a subpleural ground-glass nodule with a consolidation-to-tumor ratio ≤50.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Accuracy of solid portion size measured on multiplanar volume rendering images for assessing invasiveness in lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as subsolid nodules.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- The value of CT shape quantification in predicting pathological classification of lung adenocarcinoma.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- A delta-radiomics model for preoperative prediction of invasive lung adenocarcinomas manifesting as radiological part-solid nodules.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Verification of the eighth edition of the UICC-TNM classification on surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma: Comparison with previous classification in a local center.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Clinical T category for lung cancer staging: A pragmatic approach for real-world practice.Thoracic cancer · 2020Article
- New T1 classification.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020Review
- Interobserver size measurement variability in part-solid lung adenocarcinoma using pre-operative computed tomography.Journal of thoracic disease · 2019Article
- Article
- CT diagnosis of pleural and stromal invasion in malignant subpleural pure ground-glass nodules: an exploratory study.European radiology · 2019Article
- Effect of CT window settings on size measurements of the solid component in subsolid nodules: evaluation of prediction efficacy of the degree of pathological malignancy in lung adenocarcinoma.The British journal of radiology · 2018Article
- [Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital Experts Consensus on the Management of Ground-Glass Nodules Suspected as Lung Adenocarcinoma (Version 1)].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2018Article
- Article
- Retrospective assessment of interobserver agreement and accuracy in classifications and measurements in subsolid nodules with solid components less than 8mm: which window setting is better?European radiology · 2017Article
- Radiological prediction of tumor invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma on thin-section CT.Medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe aimed to retrospectively investigate CT findings of minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) and to determine the appropriate method for measurement of solid portions in MIAs at CT.
methodsFrom May 2012 to April 2014, 55 pulmonary nodules in 52 patients were pathologically confirmed as MIAs and were included in this study. CT findings of MIAs and measurements of solid portions at CT were evaluated by two independent radiologists.
resultsMean size of MIAs was 10.5 mm ± 4.8 (range, 4-28 mm). Fifty-two MIAs manifested as 28 pure ground glass nodules (GGNs) (53.8 % %), 22 part-solid GGNs (42.3 % %), and 2 two solid nodules (3.8 % %) at CT. Lobulated border, bubble lucency, and pleural retraction were frequently found in both observers (26.9-42.3 % %). Differences according to window settings between solid portion size and invasive component size were not significantly different in both observers (p > 0.05). As for interobserver agreement, 95 % CIs for solid portion size in the mediastinal window setting (-2.2 to 3.4; mean, 0.6) were slightly narrower than those in the lung window setting (-2.6 to 3.1; mean, 0.3).
conclusionsNearly all MIAs appear as pure and part-solid GGNs. Mediastinal and lung window settings can be applied for measurement of solid portions at CT without a significant difference. KEY POINTS: • Nearly all MIAs appear as pure and part-solid GGNs. • MIAs show frequent interval growth at follow-up. • MIAs with solid portion ≥5 mm ranged from 7.7 % to 19.2 %. • Mediastinal and lung window settings can be applied for solid portion measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25680719What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.