Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25680716›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2015

Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma using dual-phase (18)F-FDG PET/CT.

Byung Hyun Byun, Sung Hoon Kim, Sang Moo Lim, Ilhan Lim, Chang-Bae Kong, Won Seok Song, Wan Hyeong Cho, Dae-Geun Jeon, Soo-Yong Lee, Jae-Soo Koh and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03742063 (Clinical Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Primary Malignant Sarcomas That Originate in Bone), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03742063 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Primary Malignant Sarcomas That Originate in Bone: a Multi-center Retrospective Study for Standardization and Modification of Response Evaluation Criteria

TypeobservationalSponsorPeking University People's HospitalRan2017 to 2018Enrolled190ConditionsClinical Response, Histopathological Response, PrognosisArmsfirst-line chemotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The British journal of radiology · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Byung Hyun ByunDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seocho-gu Banpo-dong 505, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 137-040.
Sung Hoon Kim
Sang Moo Lim
Ilhan Lim
Chang-Bae Kong
Won Seok Song
Wan Hyeong Cho
Dae-Geun Jeon
Soo-Yong Lee
Jae-Soo Koh
Soo Kyo Chung
Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences · KRCatholic University of Korea · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe evaluated the ability of dual-phase (18)F-FDG PET/CT to predict the histological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in osteosarcoma.

methodsThirty-one patients with osteosarcoma treated with NAC and surgery were prospectively enrolled. After injection of (18)F-FDG, both early (~60 min) and delayed (~150 min) PET were acquired before and after the completion of NAC. SUVmax, early/delayed SUVmax change (RImax), and early/delayed SUVmean change (RImean) of tumour were measured before (SUV1, RImax1, and RImean1) and after NAC (SUV2, RImax2, and RImean2). Then, we calculated the percentage changes between SUV1 and SUV2 (%SUV).

resultsTwelve patients (39%) exhibited good histological response after NAC. SUVmax, RImax, and RImean significantly decreased after NAC. Before NAC, only RImean1 predicted good histological response with the optimal criterion of < 10%, sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 57%, and accuracy of 71%. After NAC, %SUV, SUV2, and RImax2 predicted histological response. By using combined criterion of %SUV and RImax2 or SUV2 and RImean1 or SUV2 and RImax2, accuracies were 81%, 77%, and 77%, respectively.

conclusionsThe histological response after NAC could be predicted by using RImean1 before the initiation of NAC in osteosarcoma. The combined use of SUV and RI values may provide a better prediction. KEY POINTS: • Pretreatment dual-phase FDG-PET was useful to predict histological response in osteosarcoma. • A combination of early and delayed PET may increase the predictive value. • Early/delayed SUV change of tumours significantly decreased after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AdolescentBone NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMaleMultimodal ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyOsteosarcomaPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID25680716
OpenAlexW2058042927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.