Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25680619›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of ophthalmology2015

UK AMD EMR USERS GROUP REPORT V: benefits of initiating ranibizumab therapy for neovascular AMD in eyes with vision better than 6/12.

Aaron Y Lee, Cecilia S Lee, Thomas Butt, Wen Xing, Robert L Johnston, Usha Chakravarthy, Catherine Egan, Toks Akerele, Martin McKibbin, Louise Downey and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Epidemiology and Clinical Aspects.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Trends in Real-World Neovascular AMD Treatment Outcomes in the UK.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020
    Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 18 institutions in 4 countries.

Aaron Y LeeMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Cecilia S LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1994-7213
Thomas ButtInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
Wen XingR&D, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHSFT, London, UK.
Robert L JohnstonGloucestershire Eye Department, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK.
Usha ChakravarthyBelfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK.
Catherine EganMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Toks AkereleHinchingbrooke Health Care NHS Trust, Cambridgeshire, UK.
Martin McKibbinLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Louise DowneyHull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK.
Salim NathaWrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK.
Clare BaileyBristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Rehna KhanCalderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield, UK.
Richard AntcliffRoyal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Bath, UK.
Atul VarmaMid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Yorkshire, UK.
Vineeth KumarWirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK.
Marie TsaloumasDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Kaveri MandalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Warrington, UK.
Gerald LiewCentre for Vision Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Pearse A KeaneMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9239-745X
Dawn SimMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK Department of Cell Biology, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Catey BunceMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Adnan TufailMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
UK AMD EMR Users Group
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBBelfast Health and Social Care Trust · GBBristol Eye Hospital · GBCalderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust · GBCheltenham General Hospital · GBHinchingbrooke Health Care NHS Trust · GBHull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBMid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital · GBRoyal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust · GBThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity College London · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Washington · USWarrington and Halton Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBWirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBWrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

The ocular surface microbiome in potentially infectious ophthalmic diseaseK23EY024921 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LEE, CECILIA SUNGMIN · 2015 to 2019
$991k
Department of Health 1286NEI NIH HHS K23 EY024921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsTo study the effectiveness and clinical relevance of eyes treated with good (better than 6/12 or >70 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) visual acuity (VA) when initiating treatment with ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in the UK National Health Service. Currently eyes with VA better than (>) 6/12 are not routinely funded for therapy.

methodsMulticentre national nAMD database study on patients treated 3-5 years prior to the analysis. Anonymised structured data were collected from 14 centres. The primary outcome was the mean VA at year 1, 2 and 3. Secondary measures included the number of clinic visits and injections.

resultsThe study included 12 951 treatment-naive eyes of 11 135 patients receiving 92 976 ranibizumab treatment episodes. A total of 754 patients had baseline VA better than 6/12 and at least 1-year of follow up. Mean VA of first treated eyes with baseline VA>6/12 at year 1, 2, 3 were 6/10, 6/12, 6/15, respectively and those with baseline VA 6/12 to >6/24 were 6/15, 6/17, 6/20, respectively (p values <0.001 for comparing differences between 6/12 and 6/12-6/24 groups). For the second eyes with baseline VA>6/12, mean VA at year 1, 2, 3 were 6/9, 6/9, 6/10 and those with baseline VA 6/12 to >6/24 were 6/15, 6/15, 6/27, respectively (p values <0.001-0.005). There was no significant difference in the average number of clinic visits or injections between those with VA better and worse than 6/12.

conclusionsAll eyes with baseline VA>6/12 maintained better mean VA than the eyes with baseline VA 6/12 to >6/24 at all time points for at least 2 years. The significantly better visual outcome in patients who were treated with good baseline VA has implications on future policy regarding the treatment criteria for nAMD patients' funding.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansIntravitreal InjectionsMaleMiddle AgedRanibizumabRetreatmentUnited KingdomVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVisual AcuityAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedRanibizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, humanDrugsMaculaRetinaTreatment Medical

Identifiers

PMID25680619
PMCPMC4560462
OpenAlexW2091636586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.