Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25680318›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2015

Antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole vs. fluconazole or itraconazole in pediatric patients with neutropenia.

M Döring, M Eikemeier, K M Cabanillas Stanchi, U Hartmann, M Ebinger, C-P Schwarze, A Schulz, R Handgretinger, I Müller

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antifungal Prophylaxis With Posaconazole in Immunocompromised Children Younger Than 13 Years.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2022
    Article
  7. A Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Models of Posaconazole.Drug design, development and therapy · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Advances in the Treatment of Mycoses in Pediatric Patients.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pediatric Invasive Aspergillosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Comparison of the Efficacy of Posaconazole Delayed Release Tablets and Suspension in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

M DöringDepartment I-General Paediatrics, Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Children's Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 1, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany, michaela.doering@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
M Eikemeier
K M Cabanillas Stanchi
U Hartmann
M Ebinger
C-P Schwarze
A Schulz
R Handgretinger
I Müller
Boston Children's Hospital · USUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric patients with hemato-oncological malignancies and neutropenia resulting from chemotherapy have a high risk of acquiring invasive fungal infections. Oral antifungal prophylaxis with azoles, such as fluconazole or itraconazole, is preferentially used in pediatric patients after chemotherapy. During this retrospective analysis, posaconazole was administered based on favorable results from studies in adult patients with neutropenia and after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Retrospectively, safety, feasibility, and initial data on the efficacy of posaconazole were compared to fluconazole and itraconazole in pediatric and adolescent patients during neutropenia. Ninety-three pediatric patients with hemato-oncological malignancies with a median age of 12 years (range 9 months to 17.7 years) that had prolonged neutropenia (>5 days) after chemotherapy or due to their underlying disease, and who received fluconazole, itraconazole, or posaconazole as antifungal prophylaxis, were analyzed in this retrospective single-center survey. The incidence of invasive fungal infections in pediatric patients was low under each of the azoles. One case of proven aspergillosis occurred in each group. In addition, there were a few cases of possible invasive fungal infection under fluconazole (n = 1) and itraconazole (n = 2). However, no such cases were observed under posaconazole. The rates of potentially clinical drug-related adverse events were higher in the fluconazole (n = 4) and itraconazole (n = 5) groups compared to patients receiving posaconazole (n = 3). Posaconazole, fluconazole, and itraconazole are comparably effective in preventing invasive fungal infections in pediatric patients. Defining dose recommendations in these patients requires larger studies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntifungal AgentsChemopreventionChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFluconazoleHumansIncidenceInfantItraconazoleMaleMycosesNeoplasmsAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleItraconazoleposaconazoleTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID25680318
PMCPMC4426129
OpenAlexW2023776191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.