Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25679804›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Human vagus nerve branching in the cervical region.

Niels Hammer, Juliane Glätzner, Christine Feja, Christian Kühne, Jürgen Meixensberger, Uwe Planitzer, Stefan Schleifenbaum, Bernhard N Tillmann, Dirk Winkler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dual Vagus Nerve: a Rare Anatomical Entity.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Niels HammerInstitute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Juliane GlätznerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Clinic of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Christine FejaInstitute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian KühneDepartment of Cardiology, University Clinic of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Jürgen MeixensbergerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Clinic of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Uwe PlanitzerInstitute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, University Clinic of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
Stefan SchleifenbaumDepartment of Orthopedic, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Clinic of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Bernhard N TillmannInstitute of Anatomy, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Dirk WinklerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Clinic of Leipzig, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig, Germany.
University Hospital Leipzig · DELeipzig University · DEKiel University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVagus nerve stimulation is increasingly applied to treat epilepsy, psychiatric conditions and potentially chronic heart failure. After implanting vagus nerve electrodes to the cervical vagus nerve, side effects such as voice alterations and dyspnea or missing therapeutic effects are observed at different frequencies. Cervical vagus nerve branching might partly be responsible for these effects. However, vagus nerve branching has not yet been described in the context of vagus nerve stimulation. MATERIALS AND

methodsBranching of the cervical vagus nerve was investigated macroscopically in 35 body donors (66 cervical sides) in the carotid sheath. After X-ray imaging for determining the vertebral levels of cervical vagus nerve branching, samples were removed to confirm histologically the nerve and to calculate cervical vagus nerve diameters and cross-sections.

resultsCervical vagus nerve branching was observed in 29% of all cases (26% unilaterally, 3% bilaterally) and proven histologically in all cases. Right-sided branching (22%) was more common than left-sided branching (12%) and occurred on the level of the fourth and fifth vertebra on the left and on the level of the second to fifth vertebra on the right side. Vagus nerves without branching were significantly larger than vagus nerves with branches, concerning their diameters (4.79 mm vs. 3.78 mm) and cross-sections (7.24 mm2 vs. 5.28 mm2). DISCUSSION: Cervical vagus nerve branching is considerably more frequent than described previously. The side-dependent differences of vagus nerve branching may be linked to the asymmetric effects of the vagus nerve. Cervical vagus nerve branching should be taken into account when identifying main trunk of the vagus nerve for implanting electrodes to minimize potential side effects or lacking therapeutic benefits of vagus nerve stimulation.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleNeckTissue DonorsVagus Nerve

Identifiers

PMID25679804
PMCPMC4332499
OpenAlexW2100123523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.