Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25679414›Full record

Observational studyEye (London, England)2015

Trends in serious ocular trauma in Scotland.

P Desai, D S Morris, D C Minassian, C J MacEwen

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Eye (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Ocular injuries sustained at home in five metropolitan cities: a review of 5008 cases.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Corneal and conjunctival injury seen in urgent care centres in Israel.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Characteristics of ocular trauma in the United States.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P DesaiMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
D S MorrisCardiff Eye Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
D C MinassianInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK.
C J MacEwenUniversity Department of Ophthalmology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, Scotland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo report trends in serious, sight-threatening ocular trauma in Scotland.

methodsA prospective, population-based, observational study of patients with ocular trauma admitted to hospital in Scotland during a 12-month period (2008-2009), conducted through the British Ophthalmic Surveillance Unit. Data on circumstances of the injuries and visual outcomes were collected using protocols standardised to those from an earlier study (1991-1992) to allow direct comparisons over time.

resultsIn all, 0.3% of all emergency admissions in Scotland were for ocular trauma. Significant differences were observed between the time periods in where an injury occurred (P=0.009): a reduction of those occurring in a sports/leisure facility (8.2%) and an increase in those occurring on the street (21.4%). Assaults remained the most common cause of injury (31%). Gender differences persisted with females more likely to have an injury from falls (OR=8.67; 95% CI: 2.41-31.49; P=0.002), or in the home (OR=5.40; 95% CI: 1.69-17.16; P=0.009 ), and less likely to have one in the workplace (P=0.06). Poor visual outcome was associated with injuries occurring in the home (OR=4.33, P=0.047), in a public place (OR=6.25, P=0.047), and those caused by a fall (OR 42.75, P<0.001); or assault (OR 7.29, P=0.019). Half of those with a poor outcome have no perception of light.

conclusionSerious ocular trauma remains an infrequent, sight-threatening event, associated with significant monocular visual morbidity. The findings suggest a shift from corporate to personal responsibility for risk awareness, health, and safety.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAdolescentAdultAgedAge DistributionChildChild, PreschoolEye InjuriesFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedOccupational Injuries

Identifiers

PMID25679414
PMCPMC4429283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.