Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25679375›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Targeting of non-dominant antigens as a vaccine strategy to broaden T-cell responses during chronic viral infection.

Peter J Holst, Benjamin A H Jensen, Emeline Ragonnaud, Allan R Thomsen, Jan P Christensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PreclinicalFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current trends in tuberculosis vaccine.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Broadening CD4Journal of virology · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter J HolstDepartment of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, The Panum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark; Centre for Medical Parasitology, Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Benjamin A H JensenDepartment of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, The Panum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Emeline RagonnaudCentre for Medical Parasitology, Department of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Allan R ThomsenDepartment of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, The Panum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jan P ChristensenDepartment of International Health, Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, The Panum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we compared adenoviral vaccine vectors with the capacity to induce equally potent immune responses against non-dominant and immunodominant epitopes of murine lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV). Our results demonstrate that vaccination targeting non-dominant epitopes facilitates potent virus-induced T-cell responses against immunodominant epitopes during subsequent challenge with highly invasive virus. In contrast, when an immunodominant epitope was included in the vaccine, the T-cell response associated with viral challenge remained focussed on that epitope. Early after challenge with live virus, the CD8+ T cells specific for vaccine-encoded epitopes, displayed a phenotype typically associated with prolonged/persistent antigenic stimulation marked by high levels of KLRG-1, as compared to T cells reacting to epitopes not included in the vaccine. Notably, this association was lost over time in T cells specific for the dominant T cell epitopes, and these cells were fully capable of expanding in response to a new viral challenge. Overall, our data suggests a potential for broadening of the antiviral CD8+ T-cell response by selecting non-dominant antigens to be targeted by vaccination. In addition, our findings suggest that prior adenoviral vaccination is not likely to negatively impact the long-term and protective immune response induced and maintained by a vaccine-attenuated chronic viral infection.

Indexed as

AdenoviridaeAnimalsAntigens, ViralCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesChronic DiseaseDisease Models, AnimalEpitopes, T-LymphocyteGenetic VectorsImmunodominant EpitopesImmunologic MemoryImmunophenotypingLymphocytic ChoriomeningitisLymphocytic choriomeningitis virusMiceT-LymphocytesVaccinationAntigens, ViralEpitopes, T-LymphocyteImmunodominant EpitopesViral ProteinsViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25679375
PMCPMC4334508
OpenAlexW2153795765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.