Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25678922›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of parasitology2014

Detection of Coproantigens by Sandwich ELISA in Rabbits Experimentally Infected with Fasciola gigantica.

Said Ibrahim Shalaby, Mohammad El-Bahy, Samy Ibrahim Aboulella Shalaby, Hatem Shalaby, Neelima Gupta, Dileep Kumar Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of parasitology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Said Ibrahim ShalabyDepartment of Complementary Medicine, Medical Division, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohammad El-BahyDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Samy Ibrahim Aboulella ShalabyDepartment of Reproduction, Veterinary Division, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.
Hatem ShalabyDepartment of Parasitology, Veterinary Division, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt.
Neelima GuptaDepartment of Animal Science, MJP Rohilkhand University, Bareilly, UP, India.
Dileep Kumar GuptaDepartment of Zoology, Bareilly College, Bareilly, UP, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study was targeted to report the appearance of coproantigens in feces and circulating antibodies in the serum of Fasciola gigantica experimentally infected rabbits.

methodsCopro Hyper Immune Serum (HIS) and Excretory-Secretory Hyper Immune Serum (ES HIS) antigens were used in a sandwich ELISA for the detection of F. gigantica antigens in feces of 12 rabbits experimentally infected with different doses of F. gigantica encysted metacercariae (EMC) (10, 25 and 30 EMC). The relation between time of appearance of coproantigens in feces and anti-Fasciola antibodies in serum was evaluated.

resultsThe earliest diagnostic coproantigen was recorded at 21(st), 25(th) and 28(th) day post-infection (p.i.) in groups of rabbits infected with 30, 25 and 10 F. gigantica EMC respectively. Both HIS and ES HIS were able to detect coproantigens in feces of rabbits infected with 30 EMC at day 21 p.i. The appearance of F. gigantica coproantigens in feces of infected rabbits was concurrent to the appearance of anti-Fasciola antibodies in blood (3(rd) week p.i.). However, coproantigen has specific ability for direct assessment of active infection with minimal cross-reaction with other heterologous parasitic infections.

conclusionThe findings hold promise for a more accurate diagnostic technique in the near future for suspected Fasciola infection.

Indexed as

AntibodiesCoproantigenDiagnosisFasciola

Identifiers

PMID25678922
PMCPMC4316569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.