Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25678268›Full record

ReviewVirus research2015

Functions of the 5' and 3' ends of calicivirus genomes.

Bader Alhatlani, Surender Vashist, Ian Goodfellow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virus research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A novel calicivirus discovered in trumpeter swans (Current research in microbial sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Future virology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bader AlhatlaniDivision of Virology, Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK. Electronic address: bysa2@cam.ac.uk.
Surender VashistDivision of Virology, Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK.
Ian GoodfellowDivision of Virology, Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK. Electronic address: ig299@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 097997Wellcome Trust WT097997MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Caliciviridae family of small positive sense RNA viruses contains a diverse range of pathogens of both man and animals. The molecular mechanisms of calicivirus genome replication and translation have not been as widely studied as many other RNA viruses. With the relatively recent development of robust cell culture and reverse genetics systems for several members of the Caliciviridae family, a more in-depth analysis of the finer detail of the viral life cycle has now been obtained. As a result, the identification and characterization of the role of RNA structures in the calicivirus life cycle has also been possible. This review aims to summarize the current state of knowledge with respect to the role of RNA structures at the termini of calicivirus genomes.

Indexed as

3' Untranslated Regions5' Untranslated RegionsGenome, ViralHost-Pathogen InteractionsVirus ReplicationAnimalsCaliciviridaeConserved SequenceHumansModels, BiologicalNucleic Acid ConformationPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, ViralTranscription, Genetic3' Untranslated Regions5' Untranslated RegionsRNA, ViralCalicivirusesNorovirusRNA–protein interactionsRNA secondary structures

Identifiers

PMID25678268
PMCPMC4509552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.