ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2015
Clinical evaluation of the Nanoduct sweat test system in the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis after newborn screening.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosing cystic fibrosis in low- and middle-income countries: challenges and strategies.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Review
- Diagnosing Cystic Fibrosis in the 21st Century-A Complex and Challenging Task.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Single-centre prospective evaluation of the first 5 years of cystic fibrosis newborn screening in Germany.ERJ open research · 2024Article
- Exploring the Potential of Nanotechnology in Pediatric Healthcare: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Electrical aspects of skin as a pathway to engineering skin devices.APL bioengineering · 2021Review
- Soft, skin-interfaced sweat stickers for cystic fibrosis diagnosis and management.Science translational medicine · 2021Article
- Rethinking the causes of pilonidal sinus disease: a matched cohort study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Sweat Testing and Recent Advances.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Review
- Processing Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results for CF.International journal of neonatal screening · 2020Review
- Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis in Russia: A Catalyst for Improved Care.International journal of neonatal screening · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledAfter a positive newborn screening test for cystic fibrosis (CF), a sweat test is performed to confirm the diagnosis. The success rate of the generally acknowledged methods (Macroduct/Gibson and Cooke) in newborns varies between 73 and 99%. The Nanoduct sweat test system is easier to perform and less sweat is needed. The main aim of this study was to measure the success rate of the Nanoduct compared to current approved sweat test methods in a newborn population. After informed consent of the parents, newborns with a positive screening test for CF were included. The Macroduct or Gibson and Cooke and Nanoduct were performed in all infants, during the same appointment. The chloride concentration was determined by standard coulorimetry; conductivity was measured directly and converted to a NaCl molarity. One hundred eight newborns were included: 17 with CF, 7 with cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR)-related metabolic syndrome (CRMS), and 84 healthy children. The success rate of the Nanoduct was 93% and for the Macroduct/Gibson and Cooke 79% (McNemar, p = 0.002). The Nanoduct detected the same CF patients as the Macroduct/Gibson and Cooke; one CF patient had an equivocal result for both tests, and no patients were missed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for detection of CF with the Nanoduct was 0.999, with ideal cutoff levels of 91 and 66 mmol/l, comparable to former studies.
conclusionThe success rate of the Nanoduct to collect sufficient sweat in infants was higher compared to the Macroduct and Gibson and Cooke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.