ArticleBiomaterials2015
Implications of protein corona on physico-chemical and biological properties of magnetic nanoparticles.
Article in Biomaterials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed.
- pH-Responsive Apalutamide-Loaded ZIF‑8 Nanoparticles for Zinc-Enhanced Dual Cytotoxicity in Prostate Cancer.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Multifunctional Nano-Contrast Agent Carriers: From Traditional Platforms to Next-Generation Theranostic Applications in Molecular Imaging.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Smart Nanoformulations for Oncology: A Review on Overcoming Biological Barriers with Active Targeting, Stimuli-Responsive, and Controlled Release for Effective Drug Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- The Emerging Role of Nanocarrier-Based Delivery Systems for cGAS-STING Activation in Cancer Immunotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Biotransformation and biological fate of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical research and clinical applications.Nanoscale advances · 2025Review
- Extracellular Vesicle-Liposome-Darunavir Formulation for the Treatment of HIV Neuropathogenesis.ACS applied nano materials · 2025Article
- Silicon Dioxide Nanoparticles Affect the In Vitro Digestion of Sodium Caseinate but Not the Formation and Functionality of Bioactive Peptides.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Gold Nanoraspberries for Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering: Synthesis, Optimization, and Characterization.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Innovative nanoparticle-based approaches for modulating neutrophil extracellular traps in diseases: from mechanisms to therapeutics.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Optimization of silver nanoparticles synthesisRSC advances · 2024Article
- Impact of protein coronas on nanoparticle interactions with tissues and targeted delivery.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2024Review
- Interaction of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles with Macrophages Is Influenced Distinctly by "Self" and "Non-Self" Biological Identities.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023Article
- Comparative toxicological evaluations of novel forms nano-pesticides in liver and lung of albino rats.Journal of molecular histology · 2023Article
- pH-Responsible Doxorubicin-Loaded FePharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Core, Coating, or Corona? The Importance of Considering Protein Coronas in nano-QSPR Modeling of Zeta Potential.ACS nano · 2023Article
- Protein corona: Friend or foe? Co-opting serum proteins for nanoparticle delivery.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2023Review
- Indocyanine Green-based Glow Nanoparticles Probe for Cancer Imaging.Nanotheranostics · 2023Article
- Oxidative Precipitation Synthesis of Calcium-Doped Manganese Ferrite Nanoparticles for Magnetic Hyperthermia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Cyclodextrin-Based Polymeric Materials Bound to Corona Protein for Theranostic Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Performance of nanoparticles for biomedical applications: TheBiophysics reviews · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interaction of serum proteins and nanoparticles leads to a nanoparticle-protein complex formation that defines the rational strategy for a clinically relevant formulation for drug delivery, hyperthermia, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications in cancer nanomedicine. Given this perspective, we have examined the pattern of human serum protein corona formation with our recently engineered magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs). The alteration in particle size, zeta potential, hemotoxicity, cellular uptake/cancer cells targeting potential, and MRI properties of the MNPs after formation of human serum (HS) protein corona were studied. Our results indicated no significant change in particle size of our MNPs upon incubation with 0.5-50 wt/v% human serum, while zeta potential of MNPs turned negative due to human serum adsorption. When incubated with an increased serum and particle concentration, apolipoprotein E was adsorbed on the surface of MNPs apart from serum albumin and transferrin. However, there was no significant primary or secondary structural alterations observed in serum proteins through Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and circular dichroism. Hemolysis assay suggests almost no hemolysis at the tested concentrations (up to 1 mg/mL) for MNPs compared to the sodium dodecyl sulfate (positive control). Additionally, improved internalization and uptake of MNPs by C4-2B and Panc-1 cancer cells were observed upon incubation with human serum (HS). After serum protein adsorption to the surface of MNPs, the close vicinity within T1 (∼1.33-1.73 s) and T2 (∼12.35-13.43 ms) relaxation times suggest our MNPs retained inherent MRI potential even after biomolecular protein adsorption. All these superior clinical parameters potentially enable clinical translation and use of this formulation for next generation nanomedicine for drug delivery, cancer-targeting, imaging and theranostic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.