Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25678093›Full record

ArticleAddiction biology2016

Reflection impulsivity in binge drinking: behavioural and volumetric correlates.

Paula Banca, Iris Lange, Yulia Worbe, Nicholas A Howell, Michael Irvine, Neil A Harrison, Michael Moutoussis, Valerie Voon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Waiting Impulsivity: The Influence of Acute Methylphenidate and Feedback.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review: Suicide and its relationship to aggression and impulsivity.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Active information sampling in health and disease.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Selective effects of serotonin on choices to gather more information.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paula BancaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK.
Iris LangeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK.
Yulia WorbeBehavioural and Clinical Neurosciences Institute, University of Cambridge, UK.
Nicholas A HowellDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK.
Michael IrvineDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK.
Neil A HarrisonBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, UK.
Michael MoutoussisThe Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK.
Valerie VoonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Coimbra · PTUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001354Medical Research Council G1000183Medical Research Council G1000183BWellcome Trust 091593Wellcome Trust 093705/10/ZWellcome Trust 093875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The degree to which an individual accumulates evidence prior to making a decision, also known as reflection impulsivity, can be affected in psychiatric disorders. Here, we study decisional impulsivity in binge drinkers, a group at elevated risk for developing alcohol use disorders, comparing two tasks assessing reflection impulsivity and a delay discounting task, hypothesizing impairments in both subtypes of impulsivity. We also assess volumetric correlates of reflection impulsivity focusing on regions previously implicated in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Sixty binge drinkers and healthy volunteers were tested using two different information-gathering paradigms: the beads task and the Information Sampling Task (IST). The beads task was analysed using a behavioural approach and a Bayesian model of decision making. Delay discounting was assessed using the Monetary Choice Questionnaire. Regression analyses of primary outcomes were conducted with voxel-based morphometry analyses. Binge drinkers sought less evidence prior to decision in the beads task compared with healthy volunteers in both the behavioural and computational modelling analysis. There were no group differences in the IST or delay discounting task. Greater impulsivity as indexed by lower evidence accumulation in the beads task was associated with smaller dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal volumes. In contrast, greater impulsivity as indexed by lower evidence accumulation in the IST was associated with greater dorsal cingulate and precuneus volumes. Binge drinking is characterized by impaired reflection impulsivity suggesting a deficit in deciding on the basis of future outcomes that are more difficult to represent. These findings emphasize the role of possible therapeutic interventions targeting decision-making deficits.

Indexed as

Binge DrinkingCase-Control StudiesComputer SimulationDecision MakingDelay DiscountingFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsOrgan SizeParietal LobePrefrontal CortexYoung AdultBinge drinkingdecision makingreflection impulsivityvoxel-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID25678093
PMCPMC4766871
OpenAlexW1582607090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.