Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25677893›Full record

SynthesisJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2015

Coronary microvascular dysfunction, microvascular angina, and treatment strategies.

Mark A Marinescu, Adrián I Löffler, Michelle Ouellette, Lavone Smith, Christopher M Kramer, Jamieson M Bourque

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
150citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
21.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

150 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 297 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark A MarinescuDepartment of Medicine, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Adrián I LöfflerDepartment of Medicine, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Michelle OuelletteDepartment of Medicine, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Lavone SmithDepartment of Medicine, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Christopher M KramerDepartment of Medicine, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Jamieson M BourqueDepartment of Medicine, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia. Electronic address: jbourque@virginia.edu.
University of Virginia Health System · US

Funding

Assessment of Perfusion Reserve and Effects of Exercise in Microvascular AnginaK23HL119620 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BOURQUE, JAMIESON MACDONALD · 2013 to 2017
$745k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL119620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angina without coronary artery disease (CAD) has substantial morbidity and is present in 10% to 30% of patients undergoing angiography. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is present in 50% to 65% of these patients. The optimal treatment of this cohort is undefined. We performed a systematic review to evaluate treatment strategies for objectively-defined CMD in the absence of CAD. We included studies assessing therapy in human subjects with angina and coronary flow reserve or myocardial perfusion reserve <2.5 by positron emission tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, dilution methods, or intracoronary Doppler in the absence of coronary artery stenosis ≥50% or structural heart disease. Only 8 papers met the strict inclusion criteria. The papers were heterogeneous, using different treatments, endpoints, and definitions of CMD. The small sample sizes severely limit the power of these studies, with an average of 11 patients per analysis. Studies evaluating sildenafil, quinapril, estrogen, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation application demonstrated benefits in their respective endpoints. No benefit was found with L-arginine, doxazosin, pravastatin, and diltiazem. Our systematic review highlights that there is little data to support therapies for CMD. We assess the data meeting rigorous inclusion criteria and review the related but excluded published data. We additionally describe the next steps needed to address this research gap, including a standardized definition of CMD, routine assessment of CMD in studies of chest pain without obstructive CAD, and specific therapy assessment in the population with confirmed CMD.

Indexed as

MicrocirculationMicrovascular AnginaPractice Guidelines as TopicCoronary AngiographyCoronary CirculationDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial RevascularizationPositron-Emission TomographyRegional Blood Flowcardiac syndrome Xcoronary flow reservecoronary microvascular dysfunctionmicrovascular anginamyocardial perfusion reserve

Identifiers

PMID25677893
PMCPMC4384521
OpenAlexW2394828260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.