Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25677366›Full record

ArticleCancer2015

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is indicated for patients with thick clinically lymph node-negative melanoma.

Maki Yamamoto, Kate J Fisher, Joyce Y Wong, Jonathan M Koscso, Monique A Konstantinovic, Nicholas Govsyeyev, Jane L Messina, Amod A Sarnaik, C Wayne Cruse, Ricardo J Gonzalez and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The efficacy and predictive value ofWorld journal of surgical oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The efficacy ofAnnals of translational medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Re-evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prognostic significance of sentinel node biopsy status in cutaneous melanoma: a 21-years prospective study from a single institution.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maki YamamotoDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California at Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California.
Kate J Fisher
Joyce Y Wong
Jonathan M Koscso
Monique A Konstantinovic
Nicholas Govsyeyev
Jane L Messina
Amod A Sarnaik
C Wayne Cruse
Ricardo J Gonzalez
Vernon K Sondak
Jonathan S Zager
Moffitt Cancer Center · USUniversity of South Florida · USPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USUniversity of California, Irvine Medical Center · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
Integrative Molecular Epidemiology WorkshopR25CA174664 · NCI · AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH · PI Shelley S Tworoger · 2013 to 2026
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS R25 CA174664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is indicated for the staging of clinically lymph node-negative melanoma of intermediate thickness, but its use is controversial in patients with thick melanoma.

methodsFrom 2002 to 2012, patients with melanoma measuring ≥4 mm in thickness were evaluated at a single institution. Associations between survival and clinicopathologic characteristics were explored.

resultsOf 571 patients with melanomas measuring ≥4 mm in thickness and no distant metastases, the median age was 66 years and 401 patients (70.2%) were male. The median Breslow thickness was 6.2 mm; the predominant subtype was nodular (45.4%). SLNB was performed in 412 patients (72%) whereas 46 patients (8.1%) presented with clinically lymph node-positive disease and 113 patients (20%) did not undergo SLNB. A positive SLN was found in 161 of 412 patients (39.1%). For SLNB performed at the study institution, 14 patients with a negative SLNB developed disease recurrence in the mapped lymph node basin (false-negative rate, 12.3%). The median disease-specific survival (DSS), overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for the entire cohort were 62.1 months, 42.5 months, and 21.2 months, respectively. The DSS and OS for patients with a negative SLNB were 82.4 months and 53.4 months, respectively; 41.2 months and 34.7 months, respectively, for patients with positive SLNB; and 26.8 months and 22 months, respectively, for patients with clinically lymph node-positive disease (P<.0001). The median RFS was 32.4 months for patients who were SLNB negative, 14.3 months for patients who were SLNB positive, and 6.8 months for patients with clinically lymph node-positive disease (P<.0001).

conclusionsWith an acceptably low false-negative rate, patients with thick melanoma and a negative SLNB appear to have significantly prolonged RFS, DSS, and OS compared with those with a positive SLNB. Therefore, SLNB should be considered as indicated for patients with thick, clinically lymph node-negative melanoma.

Indexed as

Sentinel Lymph Node BiopsyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsBreslow depthfalse-negative ratemelanomasentinel lymph node biopsythick melanoma

Identifiers

PMID25677366
PMCPMC4515965
OpenAlexW1488934121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.