Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25676859›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2015

Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment: normative data of the Dutch population.

M W de Graaf, M El Moumni, E Heineman, K W Wendt, I H F Reininga

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Long-term outcomes in physical function and quality of life after traumatic thoracolumbar A3/A4 fractures: a comparison of conservative versus surgical management.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The effect of age on resilience of health-related quality of life among polytrauma patients: a cross-sectional multicenter study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Pre-injury health status of injured patients: a prospective comparison with the Dutch population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment questionnaire (SMFA).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M W de GraafDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands, m.w.de.graaf@umcg.nl.
M El Moumni
E Heineman
K W Wendt
I H F Reininga
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) is widely used in both research and clinical practice. Despite its frequent use, normative data of the SMFA have remained limited. Aim of this study was to gather normative data for the Dutch SMFA (SMFA-NL).

methodsThe SMFA-NL consists of two indices (function index and bother index) and four subscales (upper extremity dysfunction, lower extremity dysfunction, mental and emotional problems, and problems with daily activities). A total of 900 patients were invited to fill in the SMFA-NL. Six age groups (18-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, and 65-75 years) were constructed. Analysis of variance, t tests, and regression analyses were used to assess age and gender effects.

resultsThe response rate was 97 %. There was a significant difference between men and women in scores on all indices and subscales (range p < 0.001 to p = 0.002), except for the upper extremity dysfunction subscale (p = 0.06). A significant interaction effect was found between gender and age for the upper extremity dysfunction subscale; a larger decrease in score with increasing age was observed for women, compared with men. Significant differences were found between age groups for the bother index (p < 0.001), lower extremity dysfunction subscale (p = 0.001), and the problems with daily activities subscale (p = 0.002).

conclusionSignificant differences in SMFA-NL scores were found between men and women and between different age groups. These SMFA-NL normative data provide an opportunity of benchmarking health status of participants with musculoskeletal disorders or injuries against their age- and gender-matched peers in the Dutch population.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationHealth StatusSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesNetherlandsQuality of LifeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25676859
PMCPMC4493935
OpenAlexW2119102781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.