Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25676554›Full record

Trial reportModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2015

Overdiagnosis of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a multicenter, international study.

Nikhil A Sangle, Shari L Taylor, Mary J Emond, Michelle Depot, Bergein F Overholt, Mary P Bronner

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biomarker Use in Barrett's Esophagus Surveillance.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  2. Current Concepts for Diagnosing Non-Dysplastic and Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Unmet needs in Barret's esophagus diagnosis and treatment: a narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Review
  8. Utility of ancillary studies in the diagnosis and risk assessment of Barrett's esophagus and dysplasia.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Pathology of early stage cancer of the gastrointestinal tract : Definition, principles and diagnosis].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Quality Indicators in Endoscopic Ablation for Barrett's Esophagus.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nikhil A SangleDepartment of Pathology, Schulich School of Medicine and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Shari L TaylorMiraca Life Sciences, Dallas, TX, USA.
Mary J EmondDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Michelle DepotPinnacle Biologics, Bannockburn, IL, USA.
Bergein F OverholtThompson Cancer Survival Center, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Mary P Bronner1] Department of Pathology, Schulich School of Medicine and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada [2] Department of Pathology, University of Utah and ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous histological mimics of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus predispose to overdiagnosis and potential serious mismanagement, including unnecessary esophagectomy. This study investigates the prevalence and sources of this problem. Biopsies from 485 patients diagnosed with Barrett's high-grade dysplasia were screened for a multi-institutional, international Barrett's endoscopic ablation trial. Screening included review of the original diagnostic slides and an additional protocol endoscopy with an extensive biopsy sampling. Observer variability by the study pathologists was assessed through two blinded diagnostic rounds on 437 biopsies from 26 random study endoscopies. Study diagnostic reassessments revealed significantly lower rates of high-grade dysplasia. Only 248 patients (51%) were confirmed to have high-grade dysplasia. The remaining patients had inflamed gastric cardia without Barrett's (n=18; 7%), Barrett's without dysplasia (n=35; 15%), indefinite change (n=61; 26%), low-grade dysplasia (n=79; 33%), adenocarcinoma (n=43; 18%), and other (n=1; <1%), yielding an alarming total of 194 or 40% of patients who were overdiagnosed with Barrett's high-grade dysplasia. Study pathologists achieved a high-level agreement (90% three-way inter-observer agreement per biopsy, Kappa value 0.77) for high-grade dysplasia. Confounding factors promoting overdiagnosis included Barrett's inflammatory atypia (n=182), atypia limited to the basal metaplastic glands (n=147), imprecise criteria for low grade neoplasia (n=102), tangential sectioning artifact (n=59), and reactive gastric cardiac mucosa (n=38). A total of 194 patients (40%) were overdiagnosed with Barrett's high-grade dysplasia, as affirmed by the extensive screening process and high-level study pathologist agreement. The multiple diagnostic pitfalls uncovered should help raise pathologists' awareness of this problem and improve diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Medical OveruseBarrett EsophagusEsophageal DiseasesHumansObserver Variation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.