Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25675992›Full record

Trial reportCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2015

Evaluating Response to High-Dose 13.3 mg/24 h Rivastigmine Patch in Patients with Severe Alzheimer's Disease.

Martin R Farlow, Carl H Sadowsky, Drew M Velting, Xiangyi Meng, M Zahur Islam

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Neurotransmitters in Prevention and Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Rivastigmine for Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Martin R FarlowDepartment of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Carl H SadowskyDivision of Neurology, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
Drew M VeltingNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Xiangyi MengNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
M Zahur IslamNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
Novartis (United States) · USIndiana University School of MedicineNova Southeastern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo identify factors predicting improvement/stabilization on the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS-CGIC) and investigate whether early treatment responses can predict long-term outcomes, during a trial of 13.3 mg/24 h versus 4.6 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch in patients with severe Alzheimer's disease (AD).

methodsLogistic regression was used to relate Week 24 ADCS-CGIC score to potential baseline predictors. Additional analyses based on receiver-operating characteristic curves were performed using Week 8/16 ADCS-CGIC scores to predict response (13.3 mg/24 h patch) at Week 24. ADCS-CGIC score of (1) 1-3 = "improvement," (2) 1-4 = "improvement or no change".

results"Treatment" (13.3 mg/24 h patch) and increased age were significant predictors of "improvement" (P = 0.01 and P = 0.003, respectively), and "treatment" (P = 0.001), increased age (P = 0.002), and prior AD treatment (P = 0.03) for "improvement or no change". At Week 8 and 16, ADCS-CGIC scores of 4 and 5 were optimal thresholds in predicting "improvement," and "improvement or no change," respectively, at Week 24.

conclusionsA significant therapeutic effect of high-dose rivastigmine patch on ADCS-CGIC response was observed. The 13.3 mg/24 h patch was identified as a predictor of "improvement" or "improvement or no change". Patients with minimal worsening/improvement/no change after treatment initiation may be more likely to respond following long-term therapy.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAgedAlzheimer DiseaseCholinesterase InhibitorsDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMental Status ScheduleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRivastigmineROC CurveCholinesterase InhibitorsRivastigmineAlzheimer diseasePredictorReceiver-operating characteristicRivastigmineTransdermal patch

Identifiers

PMID25675992
PMCPMC6495641
OpenAlexW2088847835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.