ArticleScientific reports2015
Enhancing robustness of coupled networks under targeted recoveries.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study on the resilience of command and control networks to cascading failures based on asymmetric group dependencies.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Fragility Induced by Interdependency of Complex Networks and Their Higher-Order Networks.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A comparative analysis of approaches to network-dismantling.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Targeted Recovery as an Effective Strategy against Epidemic Spreading.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Enhancing robustness of interdependent network under recovery based on a two-layer-protection strategy.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Network robustness assessed within a dual connectivity framework: joint dynamics of the Active and Idle Networks.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Hierarchical Decomposition for Betweenness Centrality Measure of Complex Networks.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Robustness and Vulnerability of Networks with Dynamical Dependency Groups.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- The robustness of ecosystems to the species loss of community.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Localized recovery of complex networks against failure.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Redundant Design in Interdependent Networks.PloS one · 2016Article
- Predicting the Lifetime of Dynamic Networks Experiencing Persistent Random Attacks.Scientific reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coupled networks are extremely fragile because a node failure of a network would trigger a cascade of failures on the entire system. Existing studies mainly focused on the cascading failures and the robustness of coupled networks when the networks suffer from attacks. In reality, it is necessary to recover the damaged networks, and there are cascading failures in recovery processes. In this study, firstly, we analyze the cascading failures of coupled networks during recoveries. Then, a recovery robustness index is presented for evaluating the resilience of coupled networks to cascading failures in the recovery processes. Finally, we propose a technique aiming at protecting several influential nodes for enhancing robustness of coupled networks under the recoveries, and adopt six strategies based on the potential knowledge of network centrality to find the influential nodes. Experiments on three coupling networks demonstrate that with a small number of influential nodes protected, the robustness of coupled networks under the recoveries can be greatly enhanced.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.