Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25675899›Full record

ArticleBioethics2015

Introducing One Health to the Ethical Debate About Zoonotic Diseases in Southeast Asia.

Benjamin Capps, Michele Marie Bailey, David Bickford, Richard Coker, Zohar Lederman, Andrew Lover, Tamra Lysaght, Paul Tambyah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioethics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. One Health Requires a Theory of Agency.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Stamping Out Animal Culling: From Anthropocentrism to One Health Ethics.Journal of agricultural & environmental ethics · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A planetary vision for one health.BMJ global health · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. One Health, Vaccines and Ebola: The Opportunities for Shared Benefits.Journal of agricultural & environmental ethics · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin Capps
Michele Marie Bailey
David Bickford
Richard Coker
Andrew Lover
Tamra Lysaght
Paul Tambyah

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pandemic plans recommend phases of response to an emergent infectious disease (EID) outbreak, and are primarily aimed at preventing and mitigating human-to-human transmission. These plans carry presumptive weight and are increasingly being operationalized at the national, regional and international level with the support of the World Health Organization (WHO). The conventional focus of pandemic preparedness for EIDs of zoonotic origin has been on public health and human welfare. However, this focus on human populations has resulted in strategically important disciplinary silos. As the risks of zoonotic diseases have implications that reach across many domains outside traditional public health, including anthropological, environmental, and veterinary fora, a more inclusive ecological perspective is paramount for an effective response to future outbreaks.

Indexed as

Communicable Diseases, EmergingDisaster PlanningDisease OutbreaksPublic HealthAnimalsAsia, SoutheasternBiodiversityEthical AnalysisHumansInfluenza, HumanPandemicsSingaporeZoonosesOne Healthpandemic planningpublic healthzoonotics

Identifiers

PMID25675899
PMCPMC7161875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.