Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25675095›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Direct behavioral and neurophysiological evidence for retronasal olfaction in mice.

Michelle R Rebello, Padma Kandukuru, Justus V Verhagen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Multisensory Integration Underlies the Distinct Representation of Odor-Taste Mixtures in the Gustatory Cortex of Behaving Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Odor encoding by signals in the olfactory bulb.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Processing of Intraoral Olfactory and Gustatory Signals in the Gustatory Cortex of Awake Rats.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle R RebelloThe John B. Pierce Laboratory and Department of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Padma KandukuruThe John B. Pierce Laboratory and Department of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Justus V VerhagenThe John B. Pierce Laboratory and Department of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Yale University · USJohn B. Pierce Laboratory · US

Funding

Bulbar maps to retronasal smell by optical calcium imaging and fMRI in acute ratR01DC011286 · NIDCD · JOHN B. PIERCE LABORATORY, INC. · PI VERHAGEN, JUSTUS V. · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
Multimodal flavor integration and retronasal olfaction in the ratR01DC009994 · NIDCD · JOHN B. PIERCE LABORATORY, INC. · PI VERHAGEN, JUSTUS V. · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009994NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC009994NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011286NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC011286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neuroscience of flavor perception is hence becoming increasingly important to understand food flavor perception that guides food selection, ingestion and appreciation. We recently provided evidence that rats can use the retronasal mode of olfaction, an essential element of human flavor perception. We showed that in rats, like humans, odors can acquire a taste. We and others also defined how the input of the olfactory bulb (OB) -not functionally imageable in humans- codes retronasal smell in anesthetized rat. The powerful awake transgenic mouse, however, would be a valuable additional model in the study of flavor neuroscience. We used a go/no-go behavioral task to test the mouse's ability to detect and discriminate the retronasal odor amyl acetate. In this paradigm a tasteless aqueous odor solution was licked by water-restricted head-fixed mice from a lick spout. Orthonasal contamination was avoided. The retronasal odor was successfully discriminated by mice against pure distilled water in a concentration-dependent manner. Bulbectomy removed the mice's ability to discriminate the retronasal odor but not tastants. The OB showed robust optical calcium responses to retronasal odorants in these awake mice. These results suggest that mice, like rats, are capable of smelling retronasally. This direct neuro-behavioral evidence establishes the mouse as a useful additional animal model for flavor research.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalAnimalsMaleMiceModels, AnimalOdorantsOlfactory BulbOlfactory Receptor NeuronsOptical ImagingSmellTaste

Identifiers

PMID25675095
PMCPMC4326425
OpenAlexW2061838181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.