Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25674763›Full record

ArticleMedicine2015

Grading meningioma: a comparative study of thallium-SPECT and FDG-PET.

Sachi Okuchi, Tomohisa Okada, Akira Yamamoto, Mitsunori Kanagaki, Yasutaka Fushimi, Tsutomu Okada, Moritaka Yamauchi, Masako Kataoka, Yoshiki Arakawa, Jun C Takahashi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prediction of Meningioma WHO Grade Using PET Findings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. World journal of nuclear medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The diagnostic value ofInternational ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The Diagnostic Value Of UsingCancer management and research · 2019
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sachi OkuchiFrom the Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine (SO, TO, AY, MK, YF, TO, MY, MK, KT); Department of Neurosurgery (YA, JCT, SM); and Department of Clinical Pathology (SM), Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, JAPAN.
Tomohisa Okada
Akira Yamamoto
Mitsunori Kanagaki
Yasutaka Fushimi
Tsutomu Okada
Moritaka Yamauchi
Masako Kataoka
Yoshiki Arakawa
Jun C Takahashi
Sachiko Minamiguchi
Susumu Miyamoto
Kaori Togashi
Japan Research Institute · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose was to compare capability of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET and thallium-201 (Tl)-SPECT for grading meningioma.This retrospective study was conducted as a case-control study under approval by the institutional review board. In the hospital information system, 67 patients (22 men and 45 women) who had both FDG-PET and Tl-SPECT preoperative examinations were found with histopathologic diagnosis of meningioma. The maximum FDG uptake values of the tumors were measured, and they were standardized to the whole body (SUVmax) and normalized as gray matter ratio (SUVRmax). Mean and maximum Tl uptake ratios (TURmean and TURmax, respectively) of the tumors were measured and normalized as ratios to those of the contralateral normal brain. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses of the 4 indexes were conducted for differentiation between low- and high-grade meningiomas, and areas under the curves (AUCs) were compared. Correlation coefficients were calculated between these indexes and Ki-67.Fifty-six meningiomas were classified as grade I (low grade), and 11 were grade II or III (high grade). In all 4 indexes, a significant difference was observed between low- and high-grade meningiomas (P < 0.05). AUCs were 0.817 (SUVmax), 0.781 (SUVRmax), 0.810 (TURmean), and 0.831 (TURmax), and no significant difference was observed among the indexes. Their sensitivity and specificity were 72.7% to 90.9% and 71.4% to 87.5%, respectively. Correlation of the 4 indexes to Ki-67 was statistically significant, but coefficients were relatively low (0.273-0.355).Tl-SPECT, which can be used at hospitals without a cyclotron or an FDG distribution network, has high diagnostic capability of meningioma grades comparable to FDG-PET.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Thallium RadioisotopesTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesROC CurveFluorodeoxyglucose F18Thallium Radioisotopes

Identifiers

PMID25674763
PMCPMC4602750
OpenAlexW2005126052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.