Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25674267›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2014

Over-expression of lysine-specific demethylase 1 predicts tumor progression and poor prognosis in human esophageal cancer.

Lujun Chen, Yun Xu, Bin Xu, Haifeng Deng, Xiao Zheng, Changping Wu, Jingting Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Heterocycle-containing tranylcypromine derivatives endowed with high anti-LSD1 activity.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lujun ChenDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu, China.
Yun XuDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu, China.
Bin XuDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu, China.
Haifeng DengDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu, China.
Xiao ZhengDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu, China.
Changping WuDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu, China.
Jingting JiangDepartment of Tumor Biological Treatment, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Soochow University Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), the first characterized histone demethylase, roles importantly in epigenetic regulation of carcinogenesis and cancer progression. In the present study, we examined LSD1 expression in 103 cases of esophageal cancer tissues, and further investigated its relationship to patient's clinical parameters and post-operative prognosis. We found that the positive LSD1 immunochemical staining was predominantly observed on the nuclei and cytoplasm of esophageal cancer cells, while negative or very weak in adjacent normal tissues. The intensity of LSD1 immunostaining was significantly correlated to the tumor size (P = 0.013), nodal metastasis (P = 0.002), distant metastasis (P = 0.025), and TNM stage (P = 0.010), whereas it was not correlated to patient's gender, age and tumor invasion depth. The overall survival rate of patients with low LSD1 expression was better than those with high LSD1 expression (P = 0.014). We also showed that the tumor size (P = 0.003) as well as the TNM stage (P = 0.007) was a useful prognostic predictor for esophageal cancer. However, when the gender, age, tumor size, TNM stage and LSD1 expression level were involved in the multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis in a Cox's model, we showed that the tumor size (P = 0.013) and the TNM stage (P = 0.032) could be used as independent risk factors to predict patient's postoperative prognosis, but LSD1 expression level as well as other factors could not independently predict patient's outcome. Thus, our results indicated that LSD1 was involved in cancer progression and metastasis in human esophageal cancer, and could be a potential prognostic predictor for this malignancy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorDisease ProgressionEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHistone DemethylasesHumansImmunohistochemistryMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsUp-RegulationBiomarkers, TumorHistone DemethylasesKDM1A protein, humanesophageal cancerimmunohistochemistryLSD1prognosis

Identifiers

PMID25674267
PMCPMC4313962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.