ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2014
Over-expression of lysine-specific demethylase 1 predicts tumor progression and poor prognosis in human esophageal cancer.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prognostic impact of tumor length in esophageal Cancer: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1 Expression as a Prognostic Biomarker of Cancer Survival and Disease Progression.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- Toxoplasma gondii ROP18 induces maternal-fetal dysfunction by downregulating CD73 expression on decidual macrophages.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Review
- Vesicular Release and Uptake of Circular LSD1-RNAs from Non-Cancer and Cancer Lung Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Targeting the LSD1/KDM1 Family of Lysine Demethylases in Cancer and Other Human Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Review
- Heterocycle-containing tranylcypromine derivatives endowed with high anti-LSD1 activity.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2022Article
- Elevated LSD1 and SNAIL Expression Indicate Poor Prognosis in Hypopharynx Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Targeting the LSD1-G9a-ER Stress Pathway as a Novel Therapeutic Strategy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2022Article
- Epigenetic Alterations in Oesophageal Cancer: Expression and Role of the Involved Enzymes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Prognostic role of LSD1 in various cancers: evidence from a meta-analysis.OncoTargets and therapy · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), the first characterized histone demethylase, roles importantly in epigenetic regulation of carcinogenesis and cancer progression. In the present study, we examined LSD1 expression in 103 cases of esophageal cancer tissues, and further investigated its relationship to patient's clinical parameters and post-operative prognosis. We found that the positive LSD1 immunochemical staining was predominantly observed on the nuclei and cytoplasm of esophageal cancer cells, while negative or very weak in adjacent normal tissues. The intensity of LSD1 immunostaining was significantly correlated to the tumor size (P = 0.013), nodal metastasis (P = 0.002), distant metastasis (P = 0.025), and TNM stage (P = 0.010), whereas it was not correlated to patient's gender, age and tumor invasion depth. The overall survival rate of patients with low LSD1 expression was better than those with high LSD1 expression (P = 0.014). We also showed that the tumor size (P = 0.003) as well as the TNM stage (P = 0.007) was a useful prognostic predictor for esophageal cancer. However, when the gender, age, tumor size, TNM stage and LSD1 expression level were involved in the multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis in a Cox's model, we showed that the tumor size (P = 0.013) and the TNM stage (P = 0.032) could be used as independent risk factors to predict patient's postoperative prognosis, but LSD1 expression level as well as other factors could not independently predict patient's outcome. Thus, our results indicated that LSD1 was involved in cancer progression and metastasis in human esophageal cancer, and could be a potential prognostic predictor for this malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25674267PMC4313962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.