Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25674045›Full record

ArticleTobacco induced diseases2015

Evaluation and costs of volunteer telephone cessation follow-up counseling for Veteran smokers discharged from inpatient units: a quasi-experimental, mixed methods study.

Sonia A Duffy, Lee A Ewing, Samantha A Louzon, David L Ronis, Neil Jordan, Molly Harrod

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01359371 (Evaluation of Peer Telephone Cessation Counseling for Smokers), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01359371 completednot on this map

Evaluation of Peer Telephone Cessation Counseling for Smokers

TypeobservationalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2012 to 2013Enrolled131ConditionsSmokingArmsPeer telephone cessation counseling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Evaluation of a Systems-Based Tobacco Cessation Program Using Bedside Volunteers.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sonia A DuffyOhio State University, College of Nursing, Columbus, USA ; Ann Arbor VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development, P.O. Box 130170, Ann Arbor, MI 48113-0170 USA ; University of Michigan, Department of Psychiatry, Ann Arbor, USA.
Lee A EwingAnn Arbor VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development, P.O. Box 130170, Ann Arbor, MI 48113-0170 USA.
Samantha A LouzonAnn Arbor VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development, P.O. Box 130170, Ann Arbor, MI 48113-0170 USA.
David L RonisUniversity of Michigan, School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, USA.
Neil JordanCenter of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare, Hines VA Hospital, Hines, USA ; Center for Healthcare Studies and Departments of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences and Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
Molly HarrodAnn Arbor VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development, P.O. Box 130170, Ann Arbor, MI 48113-0170 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was used to evaluate the volunteer telephone smoking cessation counseling follow-up program implemented as part of the inpatient Tobacco Tactics intervention in a Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital.

methodsThis was a quasi-experimental, mixed methods design that collected data through electronic medical records (EMR), observations of telephone smoking cessation counseling calls, interviews with staff and Veterans involved in the program, and intervention costs.

resultsReach: Of the 131 Veterans referred to the smoking cessation telephone follow-up program, 19% were reached 0-1 times, while 81% were reached 2-4 times. Effectiveness: Seven-day point-prevalence 60-day quit rates (abstracted from the EMR) for those who were reached 2-4 times were 26%, compared to 8% among those who were reached 0-1 times (p = 0.06). Sixty-day 24-hour point-prevalence quit rates were 33% for those reached 2-4 times, compared to 4% of those reached 0-1 times (p < 0.01). Adoption and Implementation: The volunteers correctly followed protocol and were enthusiastic about performing the calls. Veterans who were interviewed reported positive comments about the calls. The cost to the hospital was $21 per participating Veteran, and the cost per quit was $92. Maintenance: There was short-term maintenance (about 1 year), but the program was not sustainable long term.

conclusionsQuit rates were higher among those Veterans that had greater participation in the calls. Joint Commission standards for inpatient smoking with follow-up calls are voluntary, but should these standards become mandatory, there may be more motivation for VA administration to institute a hospital-based, volunteer telephone smoking cessation follow-up program.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.Gov NCT01359371.

Indexed as

Peer supportSmoking cessationTelephone callsTobacco cessationVeterans

Identifiers

PMID25674045
PMCPMC4324430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.