ReviewClinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology2014
Temporary mechanical circulatory support: a review of the options, indications, and outcomes.
Review in Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Infective endocarditis complicated by shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart failure reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Executive Summary - Guidelines for Mechanical Circulatory Support of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2018Guideline
- The Hidden Vulnerability: How Underlying SMA Stenosis Turns Routine Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Support Into Fatal Mesenteric Ischemia.Case reports in critical care · 2026Article
- Cardiogenic Shock Management in the Modern Era: A Narrative Review of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular Physiology During Mechanical Circulatory Support: Implications for Management and Monitoring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Outcomes of prolonged support on surgically implanted microaxial left ventricular assist devices for refractory cardiogenic shock.JTCVS open · 2025Article
- Usefulness of Myocardial Injury Parameters in Predicting Prolonged Postoperative Use of Inotropes Drugs in Patients Undergoing Heart Valve Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- High Preoperative Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Values Significantly Predicted Poor Outcomes After on-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Sepsis Management in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Innovations in ventricular tachycardia ablation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023Review
- Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support: Left, Right, and Biventricular Devices.Current cardiology reviews · 2023Review
- Echocardiography in Cardiac Assist Devices.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- The CorInnova Implantable Cardiac Assist System for Direct Cardiac Compression.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Improvement of hemolysis performance in a hydrodynamically levitated centrifugal blood pump by optimizing a shroud size.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2021Article
- Outcome of Extracorporeal Ventricular Assist Device for Cardiogenic Shock as a Bridge to Transplantation.The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2020Article
- Large Animal Models of Heart Failure: A Translational Bridge to Clinical Success.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2020Review
- Hurdles to Cardioprotection in the Critically Ill.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Evaluation of the CorInnova Heart Assist Device in an Acute Heart Failure Model.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2019Article
- Cardiac Assist Devices: Early Concepts, Current Technologies, and Future Innovations.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Intra-aortic balloon pump postcardiac surgery: A literature review.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock remains a challenging disease entity and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) can be implemented in an acute setting to stabilize acutely ill patients with cardiomyopathy in a variety of clinical situations. Currently, several options exist for temporary MCS. We review the indications, contraindications, clinical applications, and evidences for a variety of temporary circulatory support options, including the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), CentriMag blood pump, and percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs), specifically the TandemHeart and Impella.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.