ArticleEvolutionary bioinformatics online2015
Classification of metagenomics data at lower taxonomic level using a robust supervised classifier.
Article in Evolutionary bioinformatics online, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring microbial diversity responses in agricultural fields: a comparative analysis under pesticide stress and non-stress conditions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- PlasFlow: predicting plasmid sequences in metagenomic data using genome signatures.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- A clinician's guide to microbiome analysis.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As more and more completely sequenced genomes become available, the taxonomic classification of metagenomic data will benefit greatly from supervised classifiers that can be updated instantaneously in response to new genomes. Currently, some supervised classifiers have been developed to assess the organism of metagenomic sequences. We have found that the existing supervised classifiers usually cannot discriminate the training data from different classes accurately when the data contain some outliers. However, the training genomic data (bacterial and archaeal genomes) usually contain a portion of outliers, which come from sequencing errors, phage invasions, and some highly expressed genes, etc. The outliers, treated as noises, prohibit the development of classifiers with better prediction accuracy. To solve the problem, we present a robust supervised classifier, weighted support vector domain description (WSVDD), which can eliminate the interference from some outliers for training genomic data and then generate more accurate data domain descriptions for each taxonomic class. The experimental results demonstrate WSVDD is more robust than other classifiers for simulated Sanger and 454 reads with different outlier rates. In addition, in experiments performed on simulated metagenomes and real gut metagenomes, WSVDD also achieved better prediction accuracy than other classifiers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.