Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25673913›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire2015

Exposure of feral swine (Sus scrofa) in the United States to selected pathogens.

John A Baroch, Carl A Gagnon, Sonia Lacouture, Marcelo Gottschalk

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Isolation of Biotype 1 Serotype 12 and Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John A BarochNational Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), US Department of Agriculture (USDA), 4101 LaPorte Ave, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521, USA (Baroch); Groupe de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses du porc, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, 3200 Sicotte, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec J2S 2M2 (Gagnon, Lacouture, Gottschalk).
Carl A GagnonNational Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), US Department of Agriculture (USDA), 4101 LaPorte Ave, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521, USA (Baroch); Groupe de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses du porc, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, 3200 Sicotte, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec J2S 2M2 (Gagnon, Lacouture, Gottschalk).
Sonia LacoutureNational Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), US Department of Agriculture (USDA), 4101 LaPorte Ave, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521, USA (Baroch); Groupe de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses du porc, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, 3200 Sicotte, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec J2S 2M2 (Gagnon, Lacouture, Gottschalk).
Marcelo GottschalkNational Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), US Department of Agriculture (USDA), 4101 LaPorte Ave, Fort Collins, Colorado 80521, USA (Baroch); Groupe de recherche sur les maladies infectieuses du porc, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, 3200 Sicotte, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec J2S 2M2 (Gagnon, Lacouture, Gottschalk).
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feral swine (Sus scrofa) are widely distributed in the United States. In 2011 and 2012, serum samples and tonsils were recovered from 162 and 37 feral swine, respectively, in the US to evaluate exposure to important swine endemic pathogens. Antibodies against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) were found in 2.5% and 25.3% of tested sera, respectively. Positive serological reactions against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae have been detected in 19.7% and 69.7% of animals. More than 15% of animals presented antibodies against these 2 pathogens simultaneously. Most animals were also seropositive for Lawsonia intracellularis. Feral swine can also be involved in transmission of zoonotic agents. Almost 50% of animals possessed antibodies against Salmonella. In addition, 94.4% of animals were carriers of Streptococcus suis in their tonsils. In conclusion, feral swine may be considered as a potential reservoir for different endemic diseases in domestic pigs, as well as for important zoonotic agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, ViralDisease ReservoirsSeroepidemiologic StudiesSus scrofaSwineSwine DiseasesUnited StatesZoonosesAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID25673913
PMCPMC4283238
OpenAlexW1480640346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.