Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25673834›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Responses to conflicting stimuli in a simple stimulus-response pathway.

Pieter Laurens Baljon, Daniel A Wagenaar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Non-synaptic Plasticity in Leech Touch Cells.Frontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pieter Laurens BaljonCalifornia Institute of Technology, Division of Biology, Pasadena, California 91125, and.
Daniel A WagenaarCalifornia Institute of Technology, Division of Biology, Pasadena, California 91125, and University of Cincinnati, Department of Biological Sciences, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221 daniel.wagenaar@uc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6222-761X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "local bend response" of the medicinal leech (Hirudo verbana) is a stimulus-response pathway that enables the animal to bend away from a pressure stimulus applied anywhere along its body. The neuronal circuitry that supports this behavior has been well described, and its responses to individual stimuli are understood in quantitative detail. We probed the local bend system with pairs of electrical stimuli to sensory neurons that could not logically be interpreted as a single touch to the body wall and used multiple suction electrodes to record simultaneously the responses in large numbers of motor neurons. In all cases, responses lasted much longer than the stimuli that triggered them, implying the presence of some form of positive feedback loop to sustain the response. When stimuli were delivered simultaneously, the resulting motor neuron output could be described as an evenly weighted linear combination of the responses to the constituent stimuli. However, when stimuli were delivered sequentially, the second stimulus had greater impact on the motor neuron output, implying that the positive feedback in the system is not strong enough to render it immune to further input.

Indexed as

Conflict, PsychologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalElectric StimulationElectrophysiological PhenomenaGanglia, InvertebrateLeechesMotor NeuronsNeural PathwaysPhysical StimulationSensationStereotyped Behaviorinvertebrateneuronal circuitssensory conflictstimulus–response pathways

Identifiers

PMID25673834
PMCPMC4323524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.