Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25673746›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Subcortical functional reorganization due to early blindness.

Gaelle S L Coullon, Fang Jiang, Ione Fine, Kate E Watkins, Holly Bridge

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The perception of auditory motion in sighted and early blind individuals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  3. Do you hear what I see? How do early blind individuals experience object motion?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neuroplasticity in visual impairments.Neurology international · 2018
    Article
  11. Autism Pathogenesis: The Superior Colliculus.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Development of visual category selectivity in ventral visual cortex does not require visual experience.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  15. Using magnetic resonance imaging to assess visual deficits: a review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2016
    Review
  16. Adaptive Pulvinar Circuitry Supports Visual Cognition.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gaelle S L CoullonOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom; gaelle.coullon@gmail.com.
Fang JiangDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada; and Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Ione FineDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Kate E WatkinsOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom;
Holly BridgeOxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom;
John Radcliffe Hospital · GBUniversity of Nevada, Reno · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

The Effects of Visual DeprivationR01EY014645 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FINE, IONE · 2004 to 2021
$5.3M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lack of visual input early in life results in occipital cortical responses to auditory and tactile stimuli. However, it remains unclear whether cross-modal plasticity also occurs in subcortical pathways. With the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging, auditory responses were compared across individuals with congenital anophthalmia (absence of eyes), those with early onset (in the first few years of life) blindness, and normally sighted individuals. We find that the superior colliculus, a "visual" subcortical structure, is recruited by the auditory system in congenital and early onset blindness. Additionally, auditory subcortical responses to monaural stimuli were altered as a result of blindness. Specifically, responses in the auditory thalamus were equally strong to contralateral and ipsilateral stimulation in both groups of blind subjects, whereas sighted controls showed stronger responses to contralateral stimulation. These findings suggest that early blindness results in substantial reorganization of subcortical auditory responses.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionNeuronal PlasticityAdultAuditory PathwaysBlindnessBrainCritical Period, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleNerve NetYoung Adultblindnesscross-modal plasticitymedial geniculate nucleussubcortical pathwayssuperior colliculus

Identifiers

PMID25673746
PMCPMC4416636
OpenAlexW2073125328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.