Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25673736›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Formation of model-free motor memories during motor adaptation depends on perturbation schedule.

Jean-Jacques Orban de Xivry, Philippe Lefèvre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Task Errors Drive Memories That Improve Sensorimotor Adaptation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Disruption of M1 Activity during Performance Plateau Impairs Consolidation of Motor Memories.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jean-Jacques Orban de XivryInstitute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics and Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium; and KU Leuven, Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Kinesiology, Leuven, Belgium jj.orban@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-7939
Philippe LefèvreInstitute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics and Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium; and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor adaptation to an external perturbation relies on several mechanisms such as model-based, model-free, strategic, or repetition-dependent learning. Depending on the experimental conditions, each of these mechanisms has more or less weight in the final adaptation state. Here we focused on the conditions that lead to the formation of a model-free motor memory (Huang VS, Haith AM, Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. Neuron 70: 787-801, 2011), i.e., a memory that does not depend on an internal model or on the size or direction of the errors experienced during the learning. The formation of such model-free motor memory was hypothesized to depend on the schedule of the perturbation (Orban de Xivry JJ, Ahmadi-Pajouh MA, Harran MD, Salimpour Y, Shadmehr R. J Neurophysiol 109: 124-136, 2013). Here we built on this observation by directly testing the nature of the motor memory after abrupt or gradual introduction of a visuomotor rotation, in an experimental paradigm where the presence of model-free motor memory can be identified (Huang VS, Haith AM, Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. Neuron 70: 787-801, 2011). We found that relearning was faster after abrupt than gradual perturbation, which suggests that model-free learning is reduced during gradual adaptation to a visuomotor rotation. In addition, the presence of savings after abrupt introduction of the perturbation but gradual extinction of the motor memory suggests that unexpected errors are necessary to induce a model-free motor memory. Overall, these data support the hypothesis that different perturbation schedules do not lead to a more or less stabilized motor memory but to distinct motor memories with different attributes and neural representations.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdultArmFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansLearningMaleMemoryMovementPsychomotor PerformanceRotationYoung Adultmodel-free memorymotor adaptationmotor learningvisuomotor rotation

Identifiers

PMID25673736
PMCPMC4416610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.