ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015
Interspecific social networks promote information transmission in wild songbirds.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Siblings and nonparental adults provide alternative pathways to cultural inheritance in juvenile great tits.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Demonstrating the reproductive consequences of cognition: learning from experience.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Cultural processes and demography: implications for conservation and beyond.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Animal social networks are robust to changing association definitions.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2025Article
- Immigrant birds learn from socially observed differences in payoffs when their environment changes.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- The contribution of movement to social network structure and spreading dynamics under simple and complex transmission.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- A protocol for assessing bias and robustness of social network metrics using GPS based radio-telemetry data.Movement ecology · 2024Article
- Experimental manipulation of population density in a wild bird alters social structure but not patch discovery rate.Animal behaviour · 2024Article
- Inferring the decision rules that drive co-foraging affiliations in wild mixed-species parrot groups.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- A classification scheme for mixed-species bird flocks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Mixed-species flock composition matters: interspecific influences on finding novel food in North American parids.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Indirect genetic effects for social network structure inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- The effect of sociality on competitive interactions among birds.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Mixed-species bird flocks re-assemble interspecific associations across an elevational gradient.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Extracting individual characteristics from population data reveals a negative social effect during honeybee defence.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Anti-Predation Responses to Conspecific versus Heterospecific Alarm Calls by the Nestlings of Two Sympatric Birds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Social information use shapes the coevolution of sociality and virulence.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022Article
- Captive Asian short-clawed otters (Royal Society open science · 2022Article
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the functional links between social structure and population processes is a central aim of evolutionary ecology. Multiple types of interactions can be represented by networks drawn for the same population, such as kinship, dominance or affiliative networks, but the relative importance of alternative networks in modulating population processes may not be clear. We illustrate this problem, and a solution, by developing a framework for testing the importance of different types of association in facilitating the transmission of information. We apply this framework to experimental data from wild songbirds that form mixed-species flocks, recording the arrival (patch discovery) of individuals to novel foraging sites. We tested whether intraspecific and interspecific social networks predicted the spread of information about novel food sites, and found that both contributed to transmission. The likelihood of acquiring information per unit of connection to knowledgeable individuals increased 22-fold for conspecifics, and 12-fold for heterospecifics. We also found that species varied in how much information they produced, suggesting that some species play a keystone role in winter foraging flocks. More generally, these analyses demonstrate that this method provides a powerful approach, using social networks to quantify the relative transmission rates across different social relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.