Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25673474›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical oncology2015

Clinical benefit of sequential use of endocrine therapies for metastatic breast cancer.

Hirotaka Iwase, Yutaka Yamamoto

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hirotaka IwaseDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Therapy, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan, hiwase@kumamoto-u.ac.jp.
Yutaka Yamamoto

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequential use of endocrine agents is common in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In premenopausal women with MBC, tamoxifen and/or a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist are options for endocrine treatment. Meta-analysis showed that the combination of the two agents is superior to either monotherapy. Under ovarian ablation or function-suppression, an agent used to treat postmenopausal women, such as the aromatase inhibitor (AI), fulvestrant, becomes possible as a subsequent therapy. In postmenopausal women, endocrine treatment options are widely available and an optimal sequence has not yet to be determined. Options for first-line therapy of metastatic disease include an AI for women who have received adjuvant tamoxifen, or tamoxifen for patients who have received adjuvant AI. In addition, data suggest that fulvestrant is a promising therapeutic option that has proven efficacy in the treatment of postmenopausal women with MBC. Other agents that may be used in the sequence include a steroidal AI or a progestin. Furthermore, estrogen additive therapy by with diethylstilbestrol or ethinylestradiol has recently been revived and showed a high response rate as a salvage endocrine therapy, although its mechanism of action is still unclear. Thus, sequential use of endocrine therapies, especially the use of a subsequent therapy with a different mechanism of action to the prior therapy, has a beneficial effect in maintaining a good quality of life and extending survival for MBC with hormone responsiveness.

Indexed as

AndrogensAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsEstradiolEstrogensFemaleFulvestrantGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansMedroxyprogesterone AcetateNeoplasm MetastasisOvariectomyPostmenopausePremenopauseProgesteroneAndrogensAromatase InhibitorsEstradiolEstrogensFulvestrantGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneMedroxyprogesterone AcetateProgesteroneSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTamoxifen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.