ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015
[Peritoneal adhesion formation].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Macrophage-Rich Peritoneal Compartments and CCR2-Dependent Hematopoietic Recruitment Are Differentially Associated with Adhesion Formation After Abdominal Surgery.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Comparison of adhesion prevention capabilities of the modified starch powder-based medical devices 4DryFieldInternational journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Ligustrazine nanoparticles nano spray's activation on Nrf2/ARE pathway in oxidative stress injury in rats with postoperative abdominal adhesion.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Tetramethylpyrazine Improves Postoperative Tissue Adhesion: A Drug Repurposing.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2019Review
- Development of an Anti-Adhesive Membrane for Use in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery.International journal of medical sciences · 2018Article
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Peritoneal Adhesion Prevention Devices in a Rat Model.International journal of medical sciences · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative peritoneal adhesions are common sequelae of abdominal surgery. Acute as well as chronic complications, including bowel obstruction, abdominal pain and infertility can arise from adhesion formation. So far, the only reliable treatment is surgical adhesiolysis, which in turn is accompanied by an increased risk of adhesion recurrence. Despite significant progress in modern perioperative medicine, only limited prophylactic approaches are available and atraumatic surgery is still the most important factor.Current research concepts focus on two major antiadhesion strategies: firstly, the intraoperative placement of mechanical barriers and secondly novel immunomodulation concepts. Clinical data about the use of antiadhesive barriers show a heterogeneous outcome. Promising data have arisen from the immunomodulatory approaches and now require a step-up development from experimental to clinical trial level.The present review gives a short overview about the current research on the pathophysiology and prevention of peritoneal adhesions. The promising data are encouraging and require realization of carefully designed prospective clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25673225What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.