ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2015
[Biliary leaks after liver resection. Prevention and treatment].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Management of postoperative bile leaks].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Incidence and risk factors of biliary leaks after partial hepatectomy within an enhanced recovery perioperative pathway: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Significance of Postprocedural Contrast Medium Injection after CT-Guided Abscess Drainage.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- [Endoscopic management of complications in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic system and the tracheobronchial tree].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Outcome of bile leakage following liver resection with hepaticojejunostomy for liver cancer.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
- [Biliary fistulas and biliary congestion after hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The surgical treatment of primary and secondary liver pathologies is nowadays standard practice. Since the first major resections performed by Langenbruch in 1888 there have been significant developments in the surgical technique. In addition to the surgical technique, the diagnostics and patient selection, perioperative care and anesthetic management as well as knowledge of liver anatomy and physiology have also shown significant developments. The proportion of complex operations, even within the framework of multimodal concepts has also increased. Despite this increasing complexity, the morbidity (< 45 %) and mortality (< 5 %) of liver surgery could be clearly reduced; however, the incidence of postoperative biliary leaks in large published series currently lies between 0 % and 30 % and has only shown a minimal reduction in recent years. The management of bile leakage requires an interdisciplinary management involving endoscopic and radiological, interventional or operative therapy. Most leakages (69-94 %) persist under conservative treatment (drainage and if necessary antibiotic therapy). For high volume fistulas and persistent biliary leakage endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) with stent placement represents the therapy of choice. Infections with biliary peritonitis and failure of interventional strategies often require revision surgery, possibly consisting of suturing if a leakage is identifiable, replacement of drainages or application of a bile duct drainage (e.g. T-drain or transhepatic external biliary drainage).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.